» Articles » PMID: 12172011

Chk2 Regulates Irradiation-induced, P53-mediated Apoptosis in Drosophila

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2002 Aug 13
PMID 12172011
Citations 42
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The tumor suppressor function of p53 has been attributed to its ability to regulate apoptosis and the cell cycle. In mammals, DNA damage, aberrant growth signals, chemotherapeutic agents, and UV irradiation activate p53, a process that is regulated by several posttranslational modifications. In Drosophila melanogaster, however, the regulation modes of p53 are still unknown. Overexpression of D. melanogaster p53 (Dmp53) in the eye induced apoptosis, resulting in a small eye phenotype. This phenotype was markedly enhanced by coexpression with D. melanogaster Chk2 (DmChk2) and was almost fully rescued by coexpression with a dominant-negative (DN), kinase-dead form of DmChk2. DN DmChk2 also inhibited Dmp53-mediated apoptosis in response to DNA damage, whereas overexpression of Grapes (Grp), the Drosophila Chk1-homolog, and its DN mutant had no effect on Dmp53-induced phenotypes. DmChk2 also activated the Dmp53 transactivation activity in cultured cells. Mutagenesis of Dmp53 amino terminal Ser residues revealed that Ser-4 is critical for its responsiveness toward DmChk2. DmChk2 activates the apoptotic activity of Dmp53 and Ser-4 is required for this effect. Contrary to results in mammals, Grapes, the Drosophila Chk1-homolog, is not involved in regulating Dmp53. Chk2 may be the ancestral regulator of p53 function.

Citing Articles

Nuclear reassembly defects after mitosis trigger apoptotic and p53-dependent safeguard mechanisms in Drosophila.

Li J, Jordana L, Mehsen H, Wang X, Archambault V PLoS Biol. 2024; 22(8):e3002780.

PMID: 39186808 PMC: 11379398. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002780.


Regulation and coordination of the different DNA damage responses in .

Baonza A, Tur-Gracia S, Perez-Aguilera M, Estella C Front Cell Dev Biol. 2022; 10:993257.

PMID: 36147740 PMC: 9486394. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2022.993257.


Distinct p53 isoforms code for opposing transcriptional outcomes.

Wylie A, Jones A, Das S, Lu W, Abrams J Dev Cell. 2022; 57(15):1833-1846.e6.

PMID: 35820415 PMC: 9378576. DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2022.06.015.


Enhanced germline stem cell longevity in Drosophila diapause.

Easwaran S, Van Ligten M, Kui M, Montell D Nat Commun. 2022; 13(1):711.

PMID: 35132083 PMC: 8821637. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-28347-z.


Coordination between cell proliferation and apoptosis after DNA damage in Drosophila.

Ruiz-Losada M, Gonzalez R, Peropadre A, Gil-Galvez A, Tena J, Baonza A Cell Death Differ. 2021; 29(4):832-845.

PMID: 34824391 PMC: 8989919. DOI: 10.1038/s41418-021-00898-6.


References
1.
Lakin N, Jackson S . Regulation of p53 in response to DNA damage. Oncogene. 2000; 18(53):7644-55. DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1203015. View

2.
Russell P . Checkpoints on the road to mitosis. Trends Biochem Sci. 1998; 23(10):399-402. DOI: 10.1016/s0968-0004(98)01291-2. View

3.
Matsuoka S, Huang M, Elledge S . Linkage of ATM to cell cycle regulation by the Chk2 protein kinase. Science. 1998; 282(5395):1893-7. DOI: 10.1126/science.282.5395.1893. View

4.
Blasina A, de Weyer I, Laus M, Luyten W, Parker A, McGowan C . A human homologue of the checkpoint kinase Cds1 directly inhibits Cdc25 phosphatase. Curr Biol. 1999; 9(1):1-10. DOI: 10.1016/s0960-9822(99)80041-4. View

5.
Rhind N, Russell P . Mitotic DNA damage and replication checkpoints in yeast. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1999; 10(6):749-58. PMC: 2864141. DOI: 10.1016/s0955-0674(98)80118-x. View