» Articles » PMID: 27075174

Different Cell Cycle Modifications Repress Apoptosis at Different Steps Independent of Developmental Signaling in Drosophila

Overview
Journal Mol Biol Cell
Date 2016 Apr 15
PMID 27075174
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Apoptotic cell death is important for the normal development of a variety of organisms. Apoptosis is also a response to DNA damage and an important barrier to oncogenesis. The apoptotic response to DNA damage is dampened in specific cell types during development. Developmental signaling pathways can repress apoptosis, and reduced cell proliferation also correlates with a lower apoptotic response. However, because developmental signaling regulates both cell proliferation and apoptosis, the relative contribution of cell division to the apoptotic response has been hard to discern in vivo. Here we use Drosophila oogenesis as an in vivo model system to determine the extent to which cell proliferation influences the apoptotic response to DNA damage. We find that different types of cell cycle modifications are sufficient to repress the apoptotic response to ionizing radiation independent of developmental signaling. The step(s) at which the apoptosis pathway was repressed depended on the type of cell cycle modification-either upstream or downstream of expression of the p53-regulated proapoptotic genes. Our findings have important implications for understanding the coordination of cell proliferation with the apoptotic response in development and disease, including cancer and the tissue-specific responses to radiation therapy.

Citing Articles

An unscheduled switch to endocycles induces a reversible senescent arrest that impairs growth of the Drosophila wing disc.

Huang Y, Hesting L, Calvi B PLoS Genet. 2024; 20(9):e1011387.

PMID: 39226333 PMC: 11398662. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1011387.


An unscheduled switch to endocycles induces a reversible senescent arrest that impairs growth of the wing disc.

Huang Y, Hesting L, Calvi B bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38559130 PMC: 10980049. DOI: 10.1101/2024.03.14.585098.


Polyploid Cancer Cell Models in Drosophila.

Wang Y, Tamori Y Genes (Basel). 2024; 15(1).

PMID: 38254985 PMC: 10815460. DOI: 10.3390/genes15010096.


The antagonistic relationship between apoptosis and polyploidy in development and cancer.

Herriage H, Huang Y, Calvi B Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2023; 156:35-43.

PMID: 37331841 PMC: 10724375. DOI: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2023.05.009.


Regulation and coordination of the different DNA damage responses in .

Baonza A, Tur-Gracia S, Perez-Aguilera M, Estella C Front Cell Dev Biol. 2022; 10:993257.

PMID: 36147740 PMC: 9486394. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2022.993257.


References
1.
Sakaue-Sawano A, Kurokawa H, Morimura T, Hanyu A, Hama H, Osawa H . Visualizing spatiotemporal dynamics of multicellular cell-cycle progression. Cell. 2008; 132(3):487-98. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.12.033. View

2.
Ni J, Liu L, Binari R, Hardy R, Shim H, Cavallaro A . A Drosophila resource of transgenic RNAi lines for neurogenetics. Genetics. 2009; 182(4):1089-100. PMC: 2728850. DOI: 10.1534/genetics.109.103630. View

3.
Varmark H, Sparks C, Nordberg J, Koppetsch B, Theurkauf W . DNA damage-induced cell death is enhanced by progression through mitosis. Cell Cycle. 2009; 8(18):2951-63. PMC: 2897049. DOI: 10.4161/cc.8.18.9539. View

4.
Hinds P, Mittnacht S, Dulic V, Arnold A, Reed S, Weinberg R . Regulation of retinoblastoma protein functions by ectopic expression of human cyclins. Cell. 1992; 70(6):993-1006. DOI: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90249-c. View

5.
Enserink J, Kolodner R . An overview of Cdk1-controlled targets and processes. Cell Div. 2010; 5:11. PMC: 2876151. DOI: 10.1186/1747-1028-5-11. View