» Articles » PMID: 12114421

Altered Irinotecan Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric High-grade Glioma Patients Receiving Enzyme-inducing Anticonvulsant Therapy

Overview
Journal Clin Cancer Res
Specialty Oncology
Date 2002 Jul 13
PMID 12114421
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of enzyme-inducing anticonvulsants (EIAs) on the disposition of irinotecan and metabolites in pediatric patients with high-grade glioma.

Experimental Design: Pediatric patients with newly diagnosed high-grade glioma were enrolled on this study between March 1999 and February 2001. During course 1, irinotecan was administered as a 60-min i.v. infusion at a dosage of 20 mg/m(2)/day for 5 days of 2 consecutive weeks. On days 1 and 12 of course 1, we collected serial plasma samples to measure the concentrations of the lactone and total forms of irinotecan and its metabolites SN-38 (7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin), SN-38 glucuronide (7-ethyl-10-[3,4,5-trihydroxy-pyran-2-carboxylic acid]camptothecin), and 7-ethyl-10-[4-N-(5-aminopentanoic acid)-1-piperidino]carbonyloxycamptothecin.

Results: Thirty-one patients were enrolled. In patients receiving EIAs, the area under the concentration versus time curve (AUC) of irinotecan lactone and SN-38 lactone was significantly lower (P = 0.01 and P = 0.002, respectively), and the irinotecan lactone clearance was significantly higher (P = 0.0003), as compared with those in patients who received no EIAs. The glucuronidation ratio was higher (P = 0.0009), and the ratio of SN-38 AUC to irinotecan AUC was lower (P = 0.02) in patients who received EIAs. Two patients receiving EIAs tolerated increased irinotecan dosages of 30 and 40 mg/m(2)/day without toxicity. One patient receiving EIAs experienced grade 3 diarrhea when the dosage of irinotecan was increased to 60 mg/m(2)/day.

Conclusions: EIAs increase the clearance of irinotecan and cause a decrease in systemic exposure to the active metabolite SN-38. Patients who are receiving irinotecan and who require anticonvulsants should be placed on non-EIA therapy, when possible.

Citing Articles

Effect of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms in the Xenobiotic-sensing Receptors NR1I2 and NR1I3 on the Pharmacokinetics and Toxicity of Irinotecan in Colorectal Cancer Patients.

Mbatchi L, Robert J, Ychou M, Boyer J, Del Rio M, Gassiot M Clin Pharmacokinet. 2016; 55(9):1145-57.

PMID: 27116457 DOI: 10.1007/s40262-016-0392-5.


Phase I dose escalation and pharmacokinetic study of oral gefitinib and irinotecan in children with refractory solid tumors.

Brennan R, Furman W, Mao S, Wu J, Turner D, Stewart C Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2014; 74(6):1191-8.

PMID: 25257509 PMC: 4562671. DOI: 10.1007/s00280-014-2593-7.


Determining the optimal dose in the development of anticancer agents.

Mathijssen R, Sparreboom A, Verweij J Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2014; 11(5):272-81.

PMID: 24663127 DOI: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2014.40.


A phase II single-arm study of irinotecan in combination with temozolomide (TEMIRI) in children with newly diagnosed high grade glioma: a joint ITCC and SIOPE-brain tumour study.

Hargrave D, Geoerger B, Frappaz D, Pietsch T, Gesner L, Cisar L J Neurooncol. 2013; 113(1):127-34.

PMID: 23459995 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-013-1098-2.


Phase I study of vincristine, irinotecan, and ¹³¹I-metaiodobenzylguanidine for patients with relapsed or refractory neuroblastoma: a new approaches to neuroblastoma therapy trial.

Dubois S, Chesler L, Groshen S, Hawkins R, Goodarzian F, Shimada H Clin Cancer Res. 2012; 18(9):2679-86.

PMID: 22421195 PMC: 6814395. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-3201.