» Articles » PMID: 16524321

Camptothecin and Podophyllotoxin Derivatives: Inhibitors of Topoisomerase I and II - Mechanisms of Action, Pharmacokinetics and Toxicity Profile

Overview
Journal Drug Saf
Specialties Pharmacology
Toxicology
Date 2006 Mar 10
PMID 16524321
Citations 37
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Camptothecins represent an established class of effective agents that selectively target topoisomerase I by trapping the catalytic intermediate of the topoisomerase I-DNA reaction, the cleavage complex. The water-soluble salt camptothecin-sodium - introduced in early trials in the 1960s - was highly toxic in animals, whereas the semisynthetic derivatives irinotecan and topotecan did not cause haemorrhagic cystitis because of their higher physicochemical stability and solubility at lower pH values. Myelosuppression, neutropenia and, to a lesser extent, thrombocytopenia are dose-limiting toxic effects of topotecan. In contrast to the structurally-related topotecan, irinotecan is a prodrug which has to be converted to SN-38, its active form. SN-38 is inactivated by conjugation, thus patients with Gilbert's syndrome and other forms of genetic glucuronidation deficiency are at an increased risk of irinotecan-induced adverse effects, such as neutropenia and diarrhoea. The cytotoxic mechanism of podophyllotoxin is the inhibition of topoisomerase II. Common adverse effects of etoposide include dose-limiting myelosuppression. Hypersensitivity reactions are more common with etoposide and teniposide than with etoposide phosphate because the formulations of the former contain sensitising solubilisers. Leukopenia and thrombocytopenia occur in 65% and 80%, respectively, of patients after administration of conventional doses of teniposide. Anorexia, vomiting and diarrhoea are generally of mild severity after administration of conventional doses of topoisomerase II inhibitors. Clinical pharmacokinetic studies have revealed substantial interindividual variabilities regarding the area under the concentration-time curve values and steady-state concentrations for all drugs reviewed in this article. Irinotecan, etoposide and teniposide are degraded via complex metabolic pathways. In contrast, topotecan primarily undergoes renal excretion. Regarding etoposide and teniposide, the extent of catechol formation over time during drug metabolism may be associated with a higher risk for secondary malignancies.

Citing Articles

Advances in research on malignant tumors and targeted agents for TOP2A (Review).

Zhou T, Niu Y, Li Y Mol Med Rep. 2024; 31(2).

PMID: 39670307 PMC: 11653171. DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2024.13415.


Reversal of the tamoxifen‑resistant breast cancer malignant phenotype by proliferation inhibition with bromosulfonamidine amino‑podophyllotoxin.

Wang J, Lv F, Zhu Y, Lu X, Zhang B Oncol Lett. 2024; 28(2):373.

PMID: 38910903 PMC: 11190816. DOI: 10.3892/ol.2024.14506.


Cellular Distribution and Ultrastructural Changes in HaCaT Cells, Induced by Podophyllotoxin and Its Novel Fluorescent Derivative, Supported by the Molecular Docking Studies.

Strus P, Sadowski K, Kostro J, Szczepankiewicz A, Nieznanska H, Niedzielska M Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(11).

PMID: 38892135 PMC: 11172492. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25115948.


Historical Perspective and Current Trends in Anticancer Drug Development.

Gach-Janczak K, Drogosz-Stachowicz J, Janecka A, Wtorek K, Mirowski M Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(10).

PMID: 38791957 PMC: 11120596. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16101878.


A pharmacovigilance study of etoposide in the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database, what does the real world say?.

Cui Z, Cheng F, Wang L, Zou F, Pan R, Tian Y Front Pharmacol. 2023; 14:1259908.

PMID: 37954852 PMC: 10637489. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1259908.


References
1.
Rowinsky E, Grochow L, Sartorius S, Bowling M, Kaufmann S, Peereboom D . Phase I and pharmacologic study of high doses of the topoisomerase I inhibitor topotecan with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with solid tumors. J Clin Oncol. 1996; 14(4):1224-35. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1996.14.4.1224. View

2.
Wasserman E, Cuvier C, Lokiec F, Goldwasser F, Kalla S, Mery-Mignard D . Combination of oxaliplatin plus irinotecan in patients with gastrointestinal tumors: results of two independent phase I studies with pharmacokinetics. J Clin Oncol. 1999; 17(6):1751-9. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.6.1751. View

3.
Mitsui I, Kumazawa E, Hirota Y, Aonuma M, Sugimori M, Ohsuki S . A new water-soluble camptothecin derivative, DX-8951f, exhibits potent antitumor activity against human tumors in vitro and in vivo. Jpn J Cancer Res. 1995; 86(8):776-82. PMC: 5920901. DOI: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.1995.tb02468.x. View

4.
Saigi E, Salut A, Campos J, Losa F, Manzano H, Batiste-Alentorn E . Phase II study of irinotecan (CPT-11) administered every 2 weeks as treatment for patients with colorectal cancer resistant to previous treatment with 5-fluorouracil-based therapies: comparison of two different dose schedules (250 and 200 mg/m2).... Anticancer Drugs. 2004; 15(9):835-41. DOI: 10.1097/00001813-200410000-00003. View

5.
Sharma R, Tobin P, Clarke S . Management of chemotherapy-induced nausea, vomiting, oral mucositis, and diarrhoea. Lancet Oncol. 2005; 6(2):93-102. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(05)01735-3. View