» Articles » PMID: 12072612

Speech Understanding in Quiet and Noise in Bilateral Users of the MED-EL COMBI 40/40+ Cochlear Implant System

Overview
Journal Ear Hear
Date 2002 Jun 20
PMID 12072612
Citations 66
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The purpose of the study was to investigate speech understanding in quiet and noise in subjects bilaterally implanted with multi-channel cochlear implants.

Design: Nine adults bilaterally implanted with MED-EL implants were included in the study. The subjects were tested in three conditions: with both implants, with the right implant only, and with the left implant only. Speech tests included monosyllables in quiet and sentences in noise (10 dB signal to noise ratio). Speech was presented from the front, and noise was presented from either 90 degrees or 270 degrees azimuth.

Results: All subjects reported benefit from bilateral stimulation. Speech scores for all subjects were higher with bilateral than with unilateral stimulation. The average score across subjects for sentence understanding was 31.1 percentage points higher with both cochlear implants compared with the cochlear implant ipsilateral to the noise, and 10.7 percentage points higher with both cochlear implants compared with the cochlear implant contralateral to the noise. The average score for recognition of monosyllabic words was 18.7 percentage points higher with both cochlear implants than with one cochlear implant. All of these differences in average scores were significant at the 5% level.

Conclusions: Bilateral cochlear implantation provides a significant benefit in speech understanding in both quiet and noise.

Citing Articles

A convolutional neural network model detecting lasting behavioral changes in mice with kanamycin-induced unilateral inner ear dysfunction.

Noda M, Koshu R, Shimada D, Sajjaviriya C, Saito C, Ito M Heliyon. 2024; 10(19):e38938.

PMID: 39435078 PMC: 11492029. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38938.


Vestibular function after simultaneous bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.

Yokoi J, Fujita T, Uehara N, Iwaki S, Kakigi A, Nibu K Front Neurol. 2023; 14:1304927.

PMID: 38020629 PMC: 10657651. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1304927.


Conception and implementation of a certification system for quality control of cochlear implant treatment in Germany.

Stover T, Plontke S, Guntinas-Lichius O, Welkoborsky H, Zahnert T, Delank K HNO. 2023; 71(Suppl 1):73-81.

PMID: 37306745 PMC: 10409661. DOI: 10.1007/s00106-023-01306-w.


[Conception and implementation of a certification system for quality control of cochlear implant treatment in Germany. German version].

Stover T, Plontke S, Guntinas-Lichius O, Welkoborsky H, Zahnert T, Delank K HNO. 2023; 71(6):396-407.

PMID: 37115246 PMC: 10234877. DOI: 10.1007/s00106-023-01305-x.


The 100 Most-Cited Manuscripts in Hearing Implants: A Bibliometrics Analysis.

Ko T, Tan D, Chu T, Chan J Cureus. 2023; 15(1):e33711.

PMID: 36793822 PMC: 9925031. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.33711.