» Articles » PMID: 26721921

Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies II: Speech Intelligibility of Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users

Abstract

Several binaural audio signal enhancement algorithms were evaluated with respect to their potential to improve speech intelligibility in noise for users of bilateral cochlear implants (CIs). 50% speech reception thresholds (SRT50) were assessed using an adaptive procedure in three distinct, realistic noise scenarios. All scenarios were highly nonstationary, complex, and included a significant amount of reverberation. Other aspects, such as the perfectly frontal target position, were idealized laboratory settings, allowing the algorithms to perform better than in corresponding real-world conditions. Eight bilaterally implanted CI users, wearing devices from three manufacturers, participated in the study. In all noise conditions, a substantial improvement in SRT50 compared to the unprocessed signal was observed for most of the algorithms tested, with the largest improvements generally provided by binaural minimum variance distortionless response (MVDR) beamforming algorithms. The largest overall improvement in speech intelligibility was achieved by an adaptive binaural MVDR in a spatially separated, single competing talker noise scenario. A no-pre-processing condition and adaptive differential microphones without a binaural link served as the two baseline conditions. SRT50 improvements provided by the binaural MVDR beamformers surpassed the performance of the adaptive differential microphones in most cases. Speech intelligibility improvements predicted by instrumental measures were shown to account for some but not all aspects of the perceptually obtained SRT50 improvements measured in bilaterally implanted CI users.

Citing Articles

Deep learning restores speech intelligibility in multi-talker interference for cochlear implant users.

Borjigin A, Kokkinakis K, Bharadwaj H, Stohl J Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):13241.

PMID: 38853168 PMC: 11163011. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-63675-8.


[Influence of directional microphones on listening effort in middle ear implant users].

Hollfelder D, Prein L, Jurgens T, Leichtle A, Bruchhage K HNO. 2022; 71(6):375-385.

PMID: 36155821 PMC: 10234921. DOI: 10.1007/s00106-022-01223-4.


Modelling speech reception thresholds and their improvements due to spatial noise reduction algorithms in bimodal cochlear implant users.

Zedan A, Jurgens T, Williges B, Hulsmeier D, Kollmeier B Hear Res. 2022; 420:108507.

PMID: 35484022 PMC: 9188268. DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2022.108507.


Cochlear Implant Research and Development in the Twenty-first Century: A Critical Update.

Carlyon R, Goehring T J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2021; 22(5):481-508.

PMID: 34432222 PMC: 8476711. DOI: 10.1007/s10162-021-00811-5.


Benefits of triple acoustic beamforming during speech-on-speech masking and sound localization for bilateral cochlear-implant users.

Yun D, Jennings T, Kidd Jr G, Goupell M J Acoust Soc Am. 2021; 149(5):3052.

PMID: 34241104 PMC: 8102069. DOI: 10.1121/10.0003933.


References
1.
Hu H, Krasoulis A, Lutman M, Bleeck S . Development of a real time sparse non-negative matrix factorization module for cochlear implants by using xPC target. Sensors (Basel). 2013; 13(10):13861-78. PMC: 3859095. DOI: 10.3390/s131013861. View

2.
Volker C, Warzybok A, Ernst S . Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies III: Speech Intelligibility of Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners. Trends Hear. 2016; 19. PMC: 4771033. DOI: 10.1177/2331216515618609. View

3.
Beltrame A, Martini A, Prosser S, Giarbini N, Streitberger C . Coupling the Vibrant Soundbridge to cochlea round window: auditory results in patients with mixed hearing loss. Otol Neurotol. 2009; 30(2):194-201. DOI: 10.1097/mao.0b013e318180a495. View

4.
Loizou P, Hu Y, Litovsky R, Yu G, Peters R, Lake J . Speech recognition by bilateral cochlear implant users in a cocktail-party setting. J Acoust Soc Am. 2009; 125(1):372-83. PMC: 2676860. DOI: 10.1121/1.3036175. View

5.
van Hoesel R, Clark G . Evaluation of a portable two-microphone adaptive beamforming speech processor with cochlear implant patients. J Acoust Soc Am. 1995; 97(4):2498-503. DOI: 10.1121/1.411970. View