» Articles » PMID: 28752811

Bilateral Versus Unilateral Cochlear Implantation in Adult Listeners: Speech-On-Speech Masking and Multitalker Localization

Overview
Journal Trends Hear
Date 2017 Jul 29
PMID 28752811
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Binaural hearing helps normal-hearing listeners localize sound sources and understand speech in noise. However, it is not fully understood how far this is the case for bilateral cochlear implant (CI) users. To determine the potential benefits of bilateral over unilateral CIs, speech comprehension thresholds (SCTs) were measured in seven Japanese bilateral CI recipients using Helen test sentences (translated into Japanese) in a two-talker speech interferer presented from the front (co-located with the target speech), ipsilateral to the first-implanted ear (at +90° or -90°), and spatially symmetric at ±90°. Spatial release from masking was calculated as the difference between co-located and spatially separated SCTs. Localization was assessed in the horizontal plane by presenting either male or female speech or both simultaneously. All measurements were performed bilaterally and unilaterally (with the first implanted ear) inside a loudspeaker array. Both SCTs and spatial release from masking were improved with bilateral CIs, demonstrating mean bilateral benefits of 7.5 dB in spatially asymmetric and 3 dB in spatially symmetric speech mixture. Localization performance varied strongly between subjects but was clearly improved with bilateral over unilateral CIs with the mean localization error reduced by 27°. Surprisingly, adding a second talker had only a negligible effect on localization.

Citing Articles

Lexical effects on talker discrimination in adult cochlear implant usersa).

Tamati T, Jebens A, Baskent D J Acoust Soc Am. 2024; 155(3):1631-1640.

PMID: 38426835 PMC: 10908561. DOI: 10.1121/10.0025011.


Effects of cochlear implantation on cognitive decline in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

An S, Jo E, Jun S, Sung J Heliyon. 2023; 9(9):e19703.

PMID: 37809368 PMC: 10558942. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19703.


Effect of interaural electrode insertion depth difference and independent band selection on sentence recognition in noise and spatial release from masking in simulated bilateral cochlear implant listening.

Fathima H, Bhat J, Pitchaimuthu A Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023; 280(7):3209-3217.

PMID: 36695909 PMC: 10220123. DOI: 10.1007/s00405-023-07845-w.


The Impact of the COVID-19 Lockdown on Quality of Life in Adult Cochlear Implant Users: A Survey Study.

Cavallaro G, Murri A, Nelson E, Gorrasi R, Quaranta N Audiol Res. 2022; 12(5):518-526.

PMID: 36285909 PMC: 9598621. DOI: 10.3390/audiolres12050052.


Effects of better-ear glimpsing, binaural unmasking, and spectral resolution on spatial release from masking in cochlear-implant users.

Gibbs 2nd B, Bernstein J, Brungart D, Goupell M J Acoust Soc Am. 2022; 152(2):1230.

PMID: 36050186 PMC: 9420049. DOI: 10.1121/10.0013746.


References
1.
Loizou P, Hu Y, Litovsky R, Yu G, Peters R, Lake J . Speech recognition by bilateral cochlear implant users in a cocktail-party setting. J Acoust Soc Am. 2009; 125(1):372-83. PMC: 2676860. DOI: 10.1121/1.3036175. View

2.
Glyde H, Cameron S, Dillon H, Hickson L, Seeto M . The effects of hearing impairment and aging on spatial processing. Ear Hear. 2012; 34(1):15-28. DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3182617f94. View

3.
Brungart D, Cohen J, Cord M, Zion D, Kalluri S . Assessment of auditory spatial awareness in complex listening environments. J Acoust Soc Am. 2014; 136(4):1808-20. DOI: 10.1121/1.4893932. View

4.
Kiessling J, Pichora-Fuller M, Gatehouse S, Stephens D, Arlinger S, Chisolm T . Candidature for and delivery of audiological services: special needs of older people. Int J Audiol. 2003; 42 Suppl 2:2S92-101. View

5.
Tyler R, Dunn C, Witt S, Noble W . Speech perception and localization with adults with bilateral sequential cochlear implants. Ear Hear. 2007; 28(2 Suppl):86S-90S. DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31803153e2. View