» Articles » PMID: 12055846

Differential Diagnosis of Taenia Saginata and Taenia Solium Infections: from DNA Probes to Polymerase Chain Reaction

Overview
Date 2002 Jun 12
PMID 12055846
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The objective of this work was the rapid and easy differential diagnosis of Taenia saginata and T. solium. First, a T. saginata size-selected genomic deoxyribonucleic acid (gDNA) library was constructed in the vector lambda gt10 using the 2-4 kb fraction from the parasite DNA digested with EcoR1, under 'star' conditions. After differential screening of the library and hybridization analysis with DNA from T. saginata, T. solium, T. taeniaeformis, T. crassiceps, and Echinococcus granulosus (bovine, porcine, and human), 2 recombinant phages were selected. They were designated HDP1 and HDP2. HDP1 reacted specifically with T. saginata DNA, and HDP2 recognized DNA from both T. saginata and T. solium. The 2 DNA probes were then sequenced and further characterized. HDP1 was a repetitive sequence with a 53 bp monomeric unit repeated 24 times in direct tandem along the 1272 bp fragment, while the 3954 bp HDP2 was not a repetitive sequence. Using the sequencing data, oligonucleotides were designed and used in a polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The 2 selected oligonucleotides from probe HDP1 (PTs4F1 and PTs4R1) specifically amplified gDNA from T. saginata, but not T. solium or other related cestodes, with a sensitivity of < 10 pg of T. saginata gDNA, about the quantity of DNA in one taeniid egg. The 3 oligonucleotides selected from the HDP2 sequence (PTs7S35F1, PTs7S35F2, and PTs7S35R1) allowed the differential amplification of gDNA from T. saginata, T. solium and E. granulosus in a multiplex PCR, again with a sensitivity of < 10 pg. These diagnostic tools have immediate application in the differential diagnosis of T. solium and T. saginata in humans and in the diagnosis of dubious cysts in the slaughterhouse. We also hope to apply them to epidemiological surveys of, for example, soil and water in endemic areas.

Citing Articles

Diagnostic tools for the detection of taeniid eggs in different environmental matrices: A systematic review.

Saelens G, Robertson L, Gabriel S Food Waterborne Parasitol. 2022; 26:e00145.

PMID: 35198745 PMC: 8844199. DOI: 10.1016/j.fawpar.2022.e00145.


HDP2: a ribosomal DNA (NTS-ETS) sequence as a target for species-specific molecular diagnosis of intestinal taeniasis in humans.

Flores M, Gonzalez L, Hurtado C, Motta Y, Dominguez-Hidalgo C, Merino F Parasit Vectors. 2018; 11(1):117.

PMID: 29486767 PMC: 6389257. DOI: 10.1186/s13071-018-2646-6.


Taenia solium: Development of an Experimental Model of Porcine Neurocysticercosis.

Fleury A, Trejo A, Cisneros H, Garcia-Navarrete R, Villalobos N, Hernandez M PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015; 9(8):e0003980.

PMID: 26252878 PMC: 4529300. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003980.


Molecular testing for clinical diagnosis and epidemiological investigations of intestinal parasitic infections.

Verweij J, Stensvold C Clin Microbiol Rev. 2014; 27(2):371-418.

PMID: 24696439 PMC: 3993103. DOI: 10.1128/CMR.00122-13.


Prevention and control of Taenia solium taeniasis/cysticercosis in Peru.

Gilman R, Gonzalez A, Llanos-Zavalaga F, Tsang V, Garcia H Pathog Glob Health. 2012; 106(5):312-8.

PMID: 23265557 PMC: 4005116. DOI: 10.1179/2047773212Y.0000000045.