» Articles » PMID: 11916840

Binding and Diffusion of CheR Molecules Within a Cluster of Membrane Receptors

Overview
Journal Biophys J
Publisher Cell Press
Specialty Biophysics
Date 2002 Mar 28
PMID 11916840
Citations 27
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Adaptation of the attractant response in Escherichia coli is attributable to the methylation of its transmembrane chemotactic receptors by the methyltransferase CheR. This protein contains two binding domains, one for the sites of methylation themselves and the other for a flexible tether at the C terminus of the receptor. We have explored the theoretical consequences of this binding geometry for a CheR molecule associated with a cluster of chemotactic receptors. Calculations show that the CheR molecule will bind with high net affinity to the receptor lattice, having a high probability of being attached by one or both of its domains at any instant of time. Because of the relatively low affinity of its individual domains and the close proximity of neighboring receptors, it is likely that when one domain unbinds it will reattach to the array before the other domain unbinds. Stochastic simulations show that the enzyme will move through the receptor cluster in a hand-over-hand fashion, like a gibbon swinging through the branches of a tree. We explore the possible consequences of this motion, which we term "molecular brachiation", for chemotactic adaptation and suggest that a similar mechanism may be operative in other large assemblies of protein molecules.

Citing Articles

Potassium-mediated bacterial chemotactic response.

Zhang C, Zhang R, Yuan J Elife. 2024; 12.

PMID: 38832501 PMC: 11149930. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.91452.


Tethered particle motion of the adaptation enzyme CheR in bacterial chemotaxis.

Yue C, Zhang C, Zhang R, Yuan J iScience. 2023; 26(10):107950.

PMID: 37817931 PMC: 10561060. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107950.


Analysis of CheW-like domains provides insights into organization of prokaryotic chemotaxis systems.

Vass L, Bourret R, Foster C Proteins. 2022; 91(3):315-329.

PMID: 36134607 PMC: 9898116. DOI: 10.1002/prot.26430.


Interplay of Affinity and Surface Tethering in Protein Recognition.

Imran A, Moyer B, Wolfe A, Cosgrove M, Makarov D, Movileanu L J Phys Chem Lett. 2022; 13(18):4021-4028.

PMID: 35485934 PMC: 9106920. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c00621.


Methyltransferase CheR binds to its chemoreceptor substrates independent of their signaling conformation yet modifies them differentially.

Li M, Hazelbauer G Protein Sci. 2019; 29(2):443-454.

PMID: 31654429 PMC: 6954704. DOI: 10.1002/pro.3760.


References
1.
Kim K, Yokota H, Kim S . Four-helical-bundle structure of the cytoplasmic domain of a serine chemotaxis receptor. Nature. 1999; 400(6746):787-92. DOI: 10.1038/23512. View

2.
Lagerholm B, Thompson N . Theory for ligand rebinding at cell membrane surfaces. Biophys J. 1998; 74(3):1215-28. PMC: 1299470. DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77836-1. View

3.
Armitage J . Bacterial tactic responses. Adv Microb Physiol. 1999; 41:229-89. DOI: 10.1016/s0065-2911(08)60168-x. View

4.
Okumura H, Nishiyama S, Sasaki A, Homma M, Kawagishi I . Chemotactic adaptation is altered by changes in the carboxy-terminal sequence conserved among the major methyl-accepting chemoreceptors. J Bacteriol. 1998; 180(7):1862-8. PMC: 107101. DOI: 10.1128/JB.180.7.1862-1868.1998. View

5.
Camacho C, Kimura S, Delisi C, Vajda S . Kinetics of desolvation-mediated protein-protein binding. Biophys J. 2000; 78(3):1094-105. PMC: 1300713. DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76668-9. View