T-cell-mediated Immune Responses in Patients with Cutaneous or Mucosal Leishmaniasis: Long-term Evaluation After Therapy
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
T-cell immune responses in patients with cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) and mucosal leishmaniasis (ML) were studied during the active disease, at the end of therapy, and 1 to 17 years posttherapy (long-term follow-up). Lymphocyte proliferative responses, phenotypic characterization of CD4(+) and CD8(+) Leishmania-reactive T cells, and cytokine production were assayed. Patients with active ML and CL showed higher proportions of CD4(+) than CD8(+) T cells. In CL, the healing process was associated with a decrease of CD4(+) and an increase of CD8(+), leading to similar CD4(+) and CD8(+) proportions. This pattern was only seen in ML after long-term therapy. Long-term follow-up of patients with CL showed a positive CD4(+)/CD8(+) ratio as observed during the active disease, although the percentages of these T cell subsets were significantly lower. Patients with CL did not show significant differences between gamma interferon (IFN-gamma) and interleukin-5 (IL-5) production during the period of study. Patients with active ML presented higher IFN-gamma and IL-5 levels compared to patients with active CL. IL-4 was only detected during active disease. Patients long term after cure from ML showed increasing production of IFN-gamma, significant decrease of IL-5, and no IL-4 production. Two apparently beneficial immunological parameters were detected in tegumentary leishmaniasis: (i) decreasing proportions of CD4(+) Leishmania-reactive T cells in the absence of IL-4 production associated with cure of CL and ML and (ii) decreasing levels of IL-5 long after cure, better detected in patients with ML. The observed T-cell responses maintained for a long period in healed patients could be relevant for immunoprotection against reinfection and used as a parameter for determining the prognosis of patients and selecting future vaccine preparations.
Distinct neutrophil effector functions in response to different isolates of Leishmania aethiopica.
Adem E, Cruz Cervera E, Yizengaw E, Takele Y, Shorter S, Cotton J Parasit Vectors. 2024; 17(1):461.
PMID: 39529155 PMC: 11555981. DOI: 10.1186/s13071-024-06489-x.
Yizengaw E, Takele Y, Franssen S, Gashaw B, Yimer M, Adem E Infect Dis Poverty. 2024; 13(1):76.
PMID: 39415297 PMC: 11484111. DOI: 10.1186/s40249-024-01244-x.
In Situ versus Systemic Immune Response in the Pathogenesis of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis.
Carvalho A, Costa R, Lago A, Bacellar O, Beiting D, Scott P Pathogens. 2024; 13(3).
PMID: 38535542 PMC: 10975199. DOI: 10.3390/pathogens13030199.
Naouar I, Kammoun Rebai W, Salah A, Bouguerra H, Toumi A, Hamida N PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2023; 17(12):e0011784.
PMID: 38064516 PMC: 10732404. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011784.
Jyotisha , Qureshi R, Qureshi I Front Immunol. 2023; 14:1269774.
PMID: 38035118 PMC: 10684680. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1269774.