» Articles » PMID: 11230549

Is Ethanol Genotoxic? A Review of the Published Data

Overview
Journal Mutagenesis
Date 2001 Mar 7
PMID 11230549
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A great many studies have been carried out on the toxicology of ethanol, the majority in the context of the effects of the consumption of alcohol in beverages. Published information relevant to the assessment of the possible genotoxic potential of ethanol has been reviewed and evaluated in terms of the safety of ethanol as an industrial chemical, rather than as a component of beverages. The available data on ethanol from standard genotoxicity test methods are incomplete. There is clear evidence that ethanol is not a bacterial or mammalian cell mutagen but in vitro assays for chromosome aberration, although mostly negative, have generally not included exogenous metabolic activation. Evidence from the use of ethanol as a vehicle control suggests that it is not mutagenic or clastogenic in vitro. Reported tests for chromosome aberration induction in vivo are all negative and only a minority of micronucleus tests are positive. Conflicting results have been reported for the dominant lethal assay, although an inter-laboratory study performed to OECD guidelines was negative. There is some evidence that ethanol induces SCE in vivo and can also act as an aneugen at high doses. Many in vivo studies were designed to model alcoholism and used very high doses, sometimes for long periods. Outcomes may have been affected by disturbances of metabolism giving rise to secondary effects. It is concluded that there is no significant evidence that ethanol is a genotoxic hazard according to the criteria normally applied for the purpose of classification and labelling of industrial chemicals. Some degree of genotoxicity may result from excessive alcohol drinking, but this is not considered relevant to any conceivable exposure obtainable by either inhalation or dermal exposure in the workplace.

Citing Articles

Ethanol potentiates the genotoxicity of the food-derived mammary carcinogen PhIP in human estrogen receptor-positive mammary cells: mechanistic support for lifestyle factors (cooked red meat and ethanol) associated with mammary cancer.

Malik D, David R, Gooderham N Arch Toxicol. 2018; 92(4):1639-1655.

PMID: 29362861 PMC: 5882637. DOI: 10.1007/s00204-018-2160-9.


Local Acetaldehyde-An Essential Role in Alcohol-Related Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Carcinogenesis.

Nieminen M, Salaspuro M Cancers (Basel). 2018; 10(1).

PMID: 29303995 PMC: 5789361. DOI: 10.3390/cancers10010011.


Genoprotective, antioxidant, antifungal and anti-inflammatory evaluation of hydroalcoholic extract of wild-growing Juniperus communis L. (Cupressaceae) native to Romanian southern sub-Carpathian hills.

Fierascu I, Ungureanu C, Avramescu S, Cimpeanu C, Georgescu M, Fierascu R BMC Complement Altern Med. 2018; 18(1):3.

PMID: 29301523 PMC: 5755145. DOI: 10.1186/s12906-017-2066-8.


Benzo(a)pyrene Exposure Causes Genotoxic and Biochemical Changes in the Midge Larvae of Chironomus sancticaroli Strixino & Strixino (Diptera: Chironomidae).

Vicentini M, Morais G, Rebechi-Baggio D, Richardi V, Santos G, Cestari M Neotrop Entomol. 2017; 46(6):658-665.

PMID: 28332138 DOI: 10.1007/s13744-017-0505-3.


Antigenotoxicity and antimutagenicity of ethanolic extracts of Brazilian green propolis and its main botanical source determined by the Allium cepa test system.

Roberto M, Jamal C, Malaspina O, Marin-Morales M Genet Mol Biol. 2016; 39(2):257-69.

PMID: 27223486 PMC: 4910559. DOI: 10.1590/1678-4685-GMB-2015-0130.