Effects of Noncontingent Reinforcement on Problem Behavior and Stimulus Engagement: the Role of Satiation, Extinction, and Alternative Reinforcement

Overview

Journal J Appl Behav Anal

Specialty Social Sciences

Date 2001 Feb 24

PMID 11214021

Citations 14

Authors

L P Hagopian

J L Crockett

M van Stone

I G DeLeon

L G Bowman

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

This study examined the effects of noncontingent reinforcement (NCR) with and without extinction on problem behavior and stimulus engagement (consumption of reinforcement) of 4 participants. Reductions in problem behavior using NCR have frequently been attributed to both satiation of the reinforcer and extinction. In the current study, aspects of the NCR treatment effects were difficult to explain based solely on either a satiation or an extinction account. Specifically, it was found that stimulus engagement remained high throughout the NCR treatment analysis, and that problem behavior was reduced to near-zero levels during NCR without extinction. The implications of these findings are discussed with respect to the satiation and extinction hypotheses frequently described in the applied literature. Findings from basic studies examining the effects of response-independent schedules are presented, and are used as the basis for a matching theory account of NCR-related effects. It is proposed that reductions in problem behavior observed during NCR interventions may be a function of the availability of alternative sources of reinforcement.

Citing Articles

Bridging the gap between laboratory and applied research on response-independent schedules.

Ingvarsson E, Fernandez E J Appl Behav Anal. 2022; 56(1):55-77.

PMID: 36440664 PMC: 10099982. DOI: 10.1002/jaba.965.

Basic and applied research on extinction bursts.

Fisher W, Greer B, Shahan T, Norris H J Appl Behav Anal. 2022; 56(1):4-28.

PMID: 36193974 PMC: 9868065. DOI: 10.1002/jaba.954.

Remote Coaching of Caregivers Via Telehealth: Challenges and Potential Solutions.

Lerman D, OBrien M, Neely L, Call N, Tsami L, Schieltz K J Behav Educ. 2022; 29(2):195-221.

PMID: 36093285 PMC: 9455948. DOI: 10.1007/s10864-020-09378-2.

Treatment Burst Data Points and Single Case Design Studies: A Bayesian N-of-1 Analysis for Estimating Treatment Effect Size.

Barnard-Brak L, Richman D, Watkins L Perspect Behav Sci. 2020; 43(2):285-301.

PMID: 32647783 PMC: 7316931. DOI: 10.1007/s40614-020-00258-8.

Using Principles from Applied Behaviour Analysis to Address an Undesired Behaviour: Functional Analysis and Treatment of Jumping Up in Companion Dogs.

Pfaller-Sadovsky N, Arnott G, Hurtado-Parrado C Animals (Basel). 2019; 9(12).

PMID: 31817670 PMC: 6940775. DOI: 10.3390/ani9121091.

References

Fisher W, Thompson R, DeLeon I, Piazza C, Kuhn D, Adelinis J . Noncontingent reinforcement: effects of satiation versus choice responding. Res Dev Disabil. 2000; 20(6):411-27. DOI: 10.1016/s0891-4222(99)00022-0. View

Kahng S, Iwata B, DeLeon I, Worsdell A . Evaluation of the "control over reinforcement" component in functional communication training. J Appl Behav Anal. 1997; 30(2):267-76; quiz 277. PMC: 1284045. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1997.30-267. View

Vollmer T, Iwata B, Zarcone J, Smith R, Mazaleski J . The role of attention in the treatment of attention-maintained self-injurious behavior: noncontingent reinforcement and differential reinforcement of other behavior. J Appl Behav Anal. 1993; 26(1):9-21. PMC: 1297716. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1993.26-9. View

Herrnstein R . On the law of effect. J Exp Anal Behav. 1970; 13(2):243-66. PMC: 1333768. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1970.13-243. View

Lalli J, Casey S, Kates K . Noncontingent reinforcement as treatment for severe problem behavior: some procedural variations. J Appl Behav Anal. 1997; 30(1):127-36; quiz 136-7. PMC: 1284026. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1997.30-127. View

Iwata B, Dorsey M, Slifer K, Bauman K, Richman G . Toward a functional analysis of self-injury. J Appl Behav Anal. 1994; 27(2):197-209. PMC: 1297798. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1994.27-197. View

Burgess I, Wearden J . Superimposition of response-independent reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1986; 45(1):75-82. PMC: 1348212. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1986.45-75. View

Vollmer T, Ringdahl J, ROANE H, Marcus B . Negative side effects of noncontingent reinforcement. J Appl Behav Anal. 1997; 30(1):161-4. PMC: 1284036. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1997.30-161. View

Lattal K, Boyer S . Alternative reinforcement effects on fixed-interval performance. J Exp Anal Behav. 1980; 34(3):285-96. PMC: 1333007. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1980.34-285. View

10.

McDowell J . The importance of Herrnstein's mathematical statement of the law of effect for behavior therapy. Am Psychol. 1982; 37(7):771-9. DOI: 10.1037//0003-066x.37.7.771. View

11.

Vollmer T, Progar P, Lalli J, Van Camp C, Sierp B, Wright C . Fixed-time schedules attenuate extinction-induced phenomena in the treatment of severe aberrant behavior. J Appl Behav Anal. 1999; 31(4):529-42. PMC: 1284146. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1998.31-529. View

12.

Michael J . Distinguishing between discriminative and motivational functions of stimuli. J Exp Anal Behav. 1982; 37(1):149-55. PMC: 1333126. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1982.37-149. View

13.

Baum W . On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974; 22(1):231-42. PMC: 1333261. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1974.22-231. View

14.

Hagopian L, Fisher W, Legacy S . Schedule effects of noncontingent reinforcement on attention-maintained destructive behavior in identical quadruplets. J Appl Behav Anal. 1994; 27(2):317-25. PMC: 1297808. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1994.27-317. View

15.

Rachlin H, Baum W . Effects of alternative reinforcement: does the source matter?. J Exp Anal Behav. 1972; 18(2):231-41. PMC: 1334008. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1972.18-231. View

16.

Lattal K, Bryan A . Effects of concurrent response-independent reinforcement on fixed-interval schedule performance. J Exp Anal Behav. 1976; 26(3):495-504. PMC: 1333539. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1976.26-495. View

17.

Fischer S, Iwata B, Mazaleski J . Noncontingent delivery of arbitrary reinforcers as treatment for self-injurious behavior. J Appl Behav Anal. 1997; 30(2):239-49. PMC: 1284043. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1997.30-239. View

18.

Marcus B, Vollmer T . Combining noncontingent reinforcement and differential reinforcement schedules as treatment for aberrant behavior. J Appl Behav Anal. 1996; 29(1):43-51. PMC: 1279872. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-43. View

19.

DeLeon I, Iwata B, Goh H, Worsdell A . Emergence of reinforcer preference as a function of schedule requirements and stimulus similarity. J Appl Behav Anal. 1998; 30(3):439-49. PMC: 1284068. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1997.30-439. View

20.

Mace F, Lalli J, Shea M, Lalli E, West B, Roberts M . The momentum of human behavior in a natural setting. J Exp Anal Behav. 1990; 54(3):163-72. PMC: 1322989. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1990.54-163. View