Noncontingent Reinforcement: a Further Examination of Schedule Effects During Treatment

Overview

Journal J Appl Behav Anal

Specialty Social Sciences

Date 2013 Jan 17

PMID 23322927

Citations 5

Authors

Michele D Wallace

Brian A Iwata

Gregory P Hanley

Rachel H Thompson

Eileen M Roscoe

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

We conducted 2 studies to determine whether dense and thin NCR schedules exert different influences over behavior and whether these influences change as dense schedules are thinned. In Study 1, we observed that thin as well as dense NCR schedules effectively decreased problem behavior exhibited by 3 individuals. In Study 2, we compared the effects of 2 NCR schedules in multielement designs, one with and the other without an extinction (EXT) component, while both schedules were thinned. Problem behavior remained low as the NCR schedule with EXT was thinned, but either (a) did not decrease initially or (b) subsequently increased as the NCR schedule without EXT was thinned. These results suggest that dense schedules of NCR decrease behavior by altering its motivating operation but that extinction occurs as the NCR schedule is thinned. The benefits and limitations of using dense or thin NCR schedules are discussed.

Citing Articles

Approaches for Treating Multiply Controlled Problem Behavior.

Boyle M, Hoffmann A, Horn J, Badger S, Gaskill L Behav Anal Pract. 2024; 17(1):53-69.

PMID: 38405283 PMC: 10891003. DOI: 10.1007/s40617-023-00858-1.

Multiple Schedules Facilitate Rapid Noncontingent Reinforcement Schedule Thinning.

Kelley M, Clark R, McGarry K, Henry J, Morgan A, Gadaire D Behav Anal Pract. 2023; 16(1):185-193.

PMID: 37006419 PMC: 10050655. DOI: 10.1007/s40617-022-00709-5.

Using Principles from Applied Behaviour Analysis to Address an Undesired Behaviour: Functional Analysis and Treatment of Jumping Up in Companion Dogs.

Pfaller-Sadovsky N, Arnott G, Hurtado-Parrado C Animals (Basel). 2019; 9(12).

PMID: 31817670 PMC: 6940775. DOI: 10.3390/ani9121091.

Noncontingent reinforcement for the treatment of severe problem behavior: An analysis of 27 consecutive applications.

Phillips C, Iannaccone J, Rooker G, P Hagopian L J Appl Behav Anal. 2017; 50(2):357-376.

PMID: 28177118 PMC: 8793041. DOI: 10.1002/jaba.376.

An Analysis of Feedback from a Behavior Analytic Perspective.

Mangiapanello K, Hemmes N Behav Anal. 2016; 38(1):51-75.

PMID: 27606167 PMC: 4883498. DOI: 10.1007/s40614-014-0026-x.

References

Conners J, Iwata B, Kahng S, Hanley G, Worsdell A, Thompson R . Differential responding in the presence and absence of discriminative stimuli during multielement functional analyses. J Appl Behav Anal. 2000; 33(3):299-308. PMC: 1284251. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.2000.33-299. View

Shukla S, Albin R . Effects of extinction alone and extinction plus functional communication training on covariation of problem behaviors. J Appl Behav Anal. 1996; 29(4):565-8. PMC: 1284010. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-565. View

Vollmer T, Iwata B, Zarcone J, Smith R, Mazaleski J . The role of attention in the treatment of attention-maintained self-injurious behavior: noncontingent reinforcement and differential reinforcement of other behavior. J Appl Behav Anal. 1993; 26(1):9-21. PMC: 1297716. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1993.26-9. View

Vollmer T, Progar P, Lalli J, Van Camp C, Sierp B, Wright C . Fixed-time schedules attenuate extinction-induced phenomena in the treatment of severe aberrant behavior. J Appl Behav Anal. 1999; 31(4):529-42. PMC: 1284146. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1998.31-529. View

Lerman D, Iwata B . A methodology for distinguishing between extinction and punishment effects associated with response blocking. J Appl Behav Anal. 1996; 29(2):231-3. PMC: 1279896. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-231. View

Goh H, Iwata B, DeLeon I . Competition between noncontingent and contingent reinforcement schedules during response acquisition. J Appl Behav Anal. 2000; 33(2):195-205. PMC: 1284238. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.2000.33-195. View

Fischer S, Iwata B, Mazaleski J . Noncontingent delivery of arbitrary reinforcers as treatment for self-injurious behavior. J Appl Behav Anal. 1997; 30(2):239-49. PMC: 1284043. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1997.30-239. View

Fisher W, OConnor J, Kurtz P, DeLeon I, Gotjen D . The effects of noncontingent delivery of high- and low-preference stimuli on attention-maintained destructive behavior. J Appl Behav Anal. 2000; 33(1):79-83. PMC: 1284224. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.2000.33-79. View

Lalli J, Casey S, Kates K . Noncontingent reinforcement as treatment for severe problem behavior: some procedural variations. J Appl Behav Anal. 1997; 30(1):127-36; quiz 136-7. PMC: 1284026. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1997.30-127. View

10.

Kahng S, Iwata B, Thompson R, Hanley G . A method for identifying satiation versus extinction effects under noncontingent reinforcement schedules. J Appl Behav Anal. 2001; 33(4):419-32. PMC: 1284268. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.2000.33-419. View

11.

Hagopian L, Crockett J, van Stone M, DeLeon I, Bowman L . Effects of noncontingent reinforcement on problem behavior and stimulus engagement: the role of satiation, extinction, and alternative reinforcement. J Appl Behav Anal. 2001; 33(4):433-49. PMC: 1284269. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.2000.33-433. View

12.

Carr J, Severtson J, Lepper T . Noncontingent reinforcement is an empirically supported treatment for problem behavior exhibited by individuals with developmental disabilities. Res Dev Disabil. 2008; 30(1):44-57. DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2008.03.002. View

13.

Kuhn D, DeLeon I, Fisher W, Wilke A . Clarifying an ambiguous functional analysis with matched and mismatched extinction procedures. J Appl Behav Anal. 1999; 32(1):99-102. PMC: 1284543. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1999.32-99. View

14.

Sajwaj T, Twardosz S, Burke M . Side effects of extinction procedures in a remedial preschool. J Appl Behav Anal. 1972; 5(2):163-75. PMC: 1310747. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1972.5-163. View

15.

Kahng S, Iwata B, DeLeon I, Wallace M . A comparison of procedures for programming noncontingent reinforcement schedules. J Appl Behav Anal. 2000; 33(2):223-31. PMC: 1284240. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.2000.33-223. View

16.

P Hagopian L, Toole L, Long E, Bowman L, Lieving G . A comparison of dense-to-lean and fixed lean schedules of alternative reinforcement and extinction. J Appl Behav Anal. 2004; 37(3):323-38. PMC: 1284507. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.2004.37-323. View

17.

Lerman D, Iwata B, Wallace M . Side effects of extinction: prevalence of bursting and aggression during the treatment of self-injurious behavior. J Appl Behav Anal. 1999; 32(1):1-8. PMC: 1284537. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1999.32-1. View

18.

Iwata B, Dorsey M, Slifer K, Bauman K, Richman G . Toward a functional analysis of self-injury. J Appl Behav Anal. 1994; 27(2):197-209. PMC: 1297798. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1994.27-197. View

19.

Hagopian L, Fisher W, Legacy S . Schedule effects of noncontingent reinforcement on attention-maintained destructive behavior in identical quadruplets. J Appl Behav Anal. 1994; 27(2):317-25. PMC: 1297808. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1994.27-317. View