» Articles » PMID: 9157097

Negative Side Effects of Noncontingent Reinforcement

Overview
Specialty Social Sciences
Date 1997 Apr 1
PMID 9157097
Citations 29
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Noncontingent reinforcement (NCR) has emerged as a treatment package for severe behavior problems. Although concerns about potential side effects (such as incidental reinforcement) have been raised, there have been few reported negative side effects in published studies to date. In this article, we report an NCR treatment evaluation for severe aggression that produced (a) an extinction burst and (b) incidental reinforcement. These side effects were evaluated by examining within-session response patterns and response distributions. As a solution, a brief omission contingency was added to the reinforcement schedule. The omission contingency resulted in decreased aggression rates.

Citing Articles

Bridging the gap between laboratory and applied research on response-independent schedules.

Ingvarsson E, Fernandez E J Appl Behav Anal. 2022; 56(1):55-77.

PMID: 36440664 PMC: 10099982. DOI: 10.1002/jaba.965.


Basic and applied research on extinction bursts.

Fisher W, Greer B, Shahan T, Norris H J Appl Behav Anal. 2022; 56(1):4-28.

PMID: 36193974 PMC: 9868065. DOI: 10.1002/jaba.954.


Noncontingent reinforcement for the treatment of severe problem behavior: An analysis of 27 consecutive applications.

Phillips C, Iannaccone J, Rooker G, P Hagopian L J Appl Behav Anal. 2017; 50(2):357-376.

PMID: 28177118 PMC: 8793041. DOI: 10.1002/jaba.376.


The role of the rat medial prefrontal cortex in adapting to changes in instrumental contingency.

Coutureau E, Esclassan F, Di Scala G, Marchand A PLoS One. 2012; 7(4):e33302.

PMID: 22496747 PMC: 3319541. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033302.


Function-based treatments for escape-maintained problem behavior: a treatment-selection model for practicing behavior analysts.

Geiger K, Carr J, LeBlanc L Behav Anal Pract. 2012; 3(1):22-32.

PMID: 22479669 PMC: 3004681. DOI: 10.1007/BF03391755.


References
1.
Repp A, Barton L, Brulle A . A comparison of two procedures for programming the differential reinforcement of other behaviors. J Appl Behav Anal. 1983; 16(4):435-45. PMC: 1307902. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1983.16-435. View

2.
Hagopian L, Fisher W, Legacy S . Schedule effects of noncontingent reinforcement on attention-maintained destructive behavior in identical quadruplets. J Appl Behav Anal. 1994; 27(2):317-25. PMC: 1297808. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1994.27-317. View

3.
Iwata B, Dorsey M, Slifer K, Bauman K, Richman G . Toward a functional analysis of self-injury. J Appl Behav Anal. 1994; 27(2):197-209. PMC: 1297798. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1994.27-197. View

4.
Vollmer T, Iwata B, Zarcone J, Smith R, Mazaleski J . The role of attention in the treatment of attention-maintained self-injurious behavior: noncontingent reinforcement and differential reinforcement of other behavior. J Appl Behav Anal. 1993; 26(1):9-21. PMC: 1297716. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1993.26-9. View