» Articles » PMID: 19398014

Different Roles of the Parahippocampal Place Area (PPA) and Retrosplenial Cortex (RSC) in Panoramic Scene Perception

Overview
Journal Neuroimage
Specialty Radiology
Date 2009 Apr 29
PMID 19398014
Citations 109
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Constructing a rich and continuous visual experience requires computing specific details across views as well as integrating similarities across views. In this paper, we report functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) evidence that these distinct computations may occur in two scene-sensitive regions in the brain, the parahippocampal place area (PPA) and retrosplenial cortex (RSC). Participants saw different snapshot views from panoramic scenes, which represented clearly different views, but appeared to come from the same scene. Using fMRI adaptation, we tested whether the PPA and RSC treated these panoramic views as the same or different. In the panoramic condition, three different views from a single panoramic scene were presented. We did not find any attenuation for panoramic repeats in the PPA, showing viewpoint-specificity. In contrast, RSC showed significant attenuation for the panoramic condition, showing viewpoint-integration. However, when the panoramic views were not presented in a continuous way, both the specificity in the PPA and the integration in RSC were lost. These results demonstrate that the PPA and RSC compute different properties of scenes: the PPA focuses on selective discrimination of different views while RSC focuses on the integration of scenes under the same visual context. These complementary functions of the PPA and RSC enable both specific and integrative representations of scenes across several viewpoints.

Citing Articles

Distinct mechanisms for panoramic and landmark-based view integration in human scene-selective cortex.

Han L, Epstein R bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39896651 PMC: 11785239. DOI: 10.1101/2025.01.24.634774.


Distributed network flows generate localized category selectivity in human visual cortex.

Cocuzza C, Sanchez-Romero R, Ito T, Mill R, Keane B, Cole M PLoS Comput Biol. 2024; 20(10):e1012507.

PMID: 39436929 PMC: 11530028. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012507.


Decreased scene-selective activity within the posterior intraparietal cortex in amblyopic adults.

Malladi S, Skerswetat J, Tootell R, Gaier E, Bex P, Hunter D bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38895262 PMC: 11185631. DOI: 10.1101/2024.06.05.597579.


Neuroarchitecture: How the Perception of Our Surroundings Impacts the Brain.

Abbas S, Okdeh N, Roufayel R, Kovacic H, Sabatier J, Fajloun Z Biology (Basel). 2024; 13(4).

PMID: 38666832 PMC: 11048496. DOI: 10.3390/biology13040220.


Common and specific activations supporting optic flow processing and navigation as revealed by a meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies.

Sulpizio V, Teghil A, Pitzalis S, Boccia M Brain Struct Funct. 2024; 229(5):1021-1045.

PMID: 38592557 PMC: 11147901. DOI: 10.1007/s00429-024-02790-8.


References
1.
Vann S, Aggleton J . Selective dysgranular retrosplenial cortex lesions in rats disrupt allocentric performance of the radial-arm maze task. Behav Neurosci. 2006; 119(6):1682-6. DOI: 10.1037/0735-7044.119.6.1682. View

2.
OCraven K, Kanwisher N . Mental imagery of faces and places activates corresponding stiimulus-specific brain regions. J Cogn Neurosci. 2001; 12(6):1013-23. DOI: 10.1162/08989290051137549. View

3.
Morris R . Developments of a water-maze procedure for studying spatial learning in the rat. J Neurosci Methods. 1984; 11(1):47-60. DOI: 10.1016/0165-0270(84)90007-4. View

4.
Flombaum J, Scholl B . A temporal same-object advantage in the tunnel effect: facilitated change detection for persisting objects. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2006; 32(4):840-53. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.4.840. View

5.
Vuilleumier P, Henson R, Driver J, Dolan R . Multiple levels of visual object constancy revealed by event-related fMRI of repetition priming. Nat Neurosci. 2002; 5(5):491-9. DOI: 10.1038/nn839. View