Value of CT Fluoroscopy for Percutaneous Biopsy Procedures
Overview
Radiology
Affiliations
Purpose: To assess the clinical impact of computed tomographic (CT) fluoroscopy (CTF) with regard to procedure time and success rate for CT image-guided biopsy procedures.
Materials And Methods: One hundred ninety consecutive patients referred to the same radiologist underwent biopsy procedures performed with use of a CT scanner equipped with fluoroscopic capabilities during a 15-month period. CTF procedures were performed predominantly by means of a continuous fluoroscopic technique, with typical exposure factors of 50 mA at 120 kV and a slice thickness of 10 mm. The total procedure time, fluoroscopy time, and complication and procedure success rates were documented prospectively in this group. A control group consisted of retrospective analysis of 93 consecutive patients who had undergone a classic CT-guided procedure performed by the same radiologist.
Results: Procedure success rate was increased in the CTF group (93.7 versus 88.2%), although the difference was not statistically significant (P > .05: Fisher exact test). A statistically significant difference was noted when comparing mean procedure times (CTF, 27.56 minutes; range, 20-60 minutes versus control, 43.17 minutes; range, 35-80 minutes; P < .0001; Welch unpaired t test).
Conclusion: CT fluoroscopy facilitates CT-guided biopsy procedures by allowing visualization of the needle trajectory from skin entry to the target point, allowing procedures to be performed more rapidly and efficiently.
Tsai C, Tsai S, Shen G, Guo G, Tsui Z, Hsieh M Heliyon. 2023; 9(7):e18329.
PMID: 37539172 PMC: 10395521. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18329.
Clinical evaluation of a robotic system for precise CT-guided percutaneous procedures.
Levy S, Goldberg S, Roth I, Shochat M, Sosna J, Leichter I Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021; 46(10):5007-5016.
PMID: 34146132 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-021-03175-9.
Radiation dose and image quality of CT fluoroscopy with partial exposure mode.
Takiguchi K, Urikura A, Yoshida T, Nakaya Y, Endo M, Aramaki T Diagn Interv Radiol. 2020; 26(4):333-338.
PMID: 32490834 PMC: 7360079. DOI: 10.5152/dir.2019.19091.
Hiraki T, Kamegawa T, Matsuno T, Sakurai J, Komaki T, Yamaguchi T Eur Radiol. 2019; 30(2):927-933.
PMID: 31444597 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-019-06409-z.
Assessment of a needle-tracking system for bipolar radiofrequency ablation.
Hirooka M, Koizumi Y, Imai Y, Ochi H, Nakamura Y, Yoshida O J Med Ultrason (2001). 2016; 43(2):185-91.
PMID: 27033864 DOI: 10.1007/s10396-015-0679-4.