» Articles » PMID: 10405410

Comparison of Methods Based on Different Molecular Epidemiological Markers for Typing of Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Complex Strains: Interlaboratory Study of Discriminatory Power and Reproducibility

Overview
Specialty Microbiology
Date 1999 Jul 16
PMID 10405410
Citations 234
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In this study, the currently known typing methods for Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates were evaluated with regard to reproducibility, discrimination, and specificity. Therefore, 90 M. tuberculosis complex strains, originating from 38 countries, were tested in five restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) typing methods and in seven PCR-based assays. In all methods, one or more repetitive DNA elements were targeted. The strain typing and the DNA fingerprint analysis were performed in the laboratory most experienced in the respective method. To examine intralaboratory reproducibility, blinded duplicate samples were included. The specificities of the various methods were tested by inclusion of 10 non-M. tuberculosis complex strains. All five RFLP typing methods were highly reproducible. The reliability of the PCR-based methods was highest for the mixed-linker PCR, followed by variable numbers of tandem repeat (VNTR) typing and spoligotyping. In contrast, the double repetitive element PCR (DRE-PCR), IS6110 inverse PCR, IS6110 ampliprinting, and arbitrarily primed PCR (APPCR) typing were found to be poorly reproducible. The 90 strains were best discriminated by IS6110 RFLP typing, yielding 84 different banding patterns, followed by mixed-linker PCR (81 patterns), APPCR (71 patterns), RFLP using the polymorphic GC-rich sequence as a probe (70 patterns), DRE-PCR (63 patterns), spoligotyping (61 patterns), and VNTR typing (56 patterns). We conclude that for epidemiological investigations, strain differentiation by IS6110 RFLP or mixed-linker PCR are the methods of choice. A strong association was found between the results of different genetic markers, indicating a clonal population structure of M. tuberculosis strains. Several separate genotype families within the M. tuberculosis complex could be recognized on the basis of the genetic markers used.

Citing Articles

Molecular epidemiology of in Ecuador: Recent advances and future challenges.

Castro-Rodriguez B, Franco-Sotomayor G, Orlando S, Garcia-Bereguiain M J Clin Tuberc Other Mycobact Dis. 2024; 37:100465.

PMID: 39184342 PMC: 11342892. DOI: 10.1016/j.jctube.2024.100465.


Experiences from 4 Years of Organization of an External Quality Assessment for Mycobacterium tuberculosis Whole-Genome Sequencing in the European Union/European Economic Area.

Anthony R, Tagliani E, Nikolayevskyy V, de Zwaan R, Mulder A, Kamst M Microbiol Spectr. 2022; 11(1):e0224422.

PMID: 36475728 PMC: 9927412. DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.02244-22.


Molecular characterization of strains isolated from cattle and humans by spoligotyping and 24-locus MIRU-VNTR, and prevalence of positive IGRA in slaughterhouse workers in Southern Turkey.

Guven Gokmen T, Yakici G, Kalayci Y, Turut N, Meral Ocal M, Haligur M Iran J Vet Res. 2022; 23(3):210-218.

PMID: 36425601 PMC: 9681978. DOI: 10.22099/IJVR.2022.42580.6186.


Unraveling the mechanisms of intrinsic drug resistance in .

Poulton N, Rock J Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022; 12:997283.

PMID: 36325467 PMC: 9618640. DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.997283.


Mycobacterium tuberculosis mixed infections and drug resistance in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review.

Micheni L, Deyno S, Bazira J Afr Health Sci. 2022; 22(1):560-572.

PMID: 36032443 PMC: 9382484. DOI: 10.4314/ahs.v22i1.65.


References
1.
Goyal M, Young D, Zhang Y, Jenkins P, Shaw R . PCR amplification of variable sequence upstream of katG gene to subdivide strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. J Clin Microbiol. 1994; 32(12):3070-1. PMC: 264232. DOI: 10.1128/jcm.32.12.3070-3071.1994. View

2.
van Soolingen D, de Haas P, Hermans P, Groenen P, van Embden J . Comparison of various repetitive DNA elements as genetic markers for strain differentiation and epidemiology of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol. 1993; 31(8):1987-95. PMC: 265684. DOI: 10.1128/jcm.31.8.1987-1995.1993. View

3.
Heersma H, Kremer K, van Embden J . Computer analysis of IS6110 RFLP patterns of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Methods Mol Biol. 1999; 101:395-422. DOI: 10.1385/0-89603-471-2:395. View

4.
Small P, Hopewell P, Singh S, Paz A, Parsonnet J, Ruston D . The epidemiology of tuberculosis in San Francisco. A population-based study using conventional and molecular methods. N Engl J Med. 1994; 330(24):1703-9. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199406163302402. View

5.
Plikaytis B, Crawford J, Woodley C, Butler W, Eisenach K, Cave M . Rapid, amplification-based fingerprinting of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Gen Microbiol. 1993; 139(7):1537-42. DOI: 10.1099/00221287-139-7-1537. View