Nicole Seiberlich
Overview
Explore the profile of Nicole Seiberlich including associated specialties, affiliations and a list of published articles.
Author names and details appear as published. Due to indexing inconsistencies, multiple individuals may share a name, and a single author may have variations. MedLuna displays this data as publicly available, without modification or verification
Snapshot
Snapshot
Articles
102
Citations
2773
Followers
0
Related Specialties
Related Specialties
Top 10 Co-Authors
Top 10 Co-Authors
Published In
Affiliations
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Recent Articles
1.
Bhusal B, Sanpitak P, Vu J, Jiang F, Richardson J, Seiberlich N, et al.
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc
. 2025 Mar;
2024:1-5.
PMID: 40040219
The prevailing view suggests low-field MRI is safer for patients with medical implants, but evidence is insufficient. Radiofrequency (RF) heating in elongated implants is complex, with many interacting factors influencing...
2.
Stojanovska J, Nijveldt R, Ordovas K, Vliegenthart R, Seiberlich N, Prieto C, et al.
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson
. 2025 Feb;
:101848.
PMID: 39948014
Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2024 Conference (CMR2024) convened in London, UK, from 24 to 26 January 2024 and brought together 2705 learners and renowned cardiac imaging professionals to discuss and learn...
3.
Kelsey L, Seiberlich N, Morehouse J, Richardson J, Srinivasan A, Bapuraj J, et al.
Radiographics
. 2025 Feb;
45(3):e240076.
PMID: 39946265
MRI for diagnosis and assessment of neurologic conditions is most commonly performed on 1.5- and 3.0-T systems. Recently, motivation to increase accessibility to MRI, coupled with advances in software and...
4.
Stojanovska J, Nijveldt R, Ordovas K, Vliegenthart R, Seiberlich N, Prieto C, et al.
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging
. 2025 Feb;
PMID: 39935424
Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2024 Conference (CMR2024) convened in London, UK, from 24 to 26 January 2024 and brought together 2705 learners and renowned cardiac imaging professionals to discuss and learn...
5.
Lavrova A, Mishra S, Kim J, Lobo R, Masotti M, Richardson J, et al.
Eur J Radiol
. 2025 Feb;
184:111929.
PMID: 39919700
Purpose: To compare the image quality of routine clinical brain MRI sequences at 0.55 T and 1.5/3T and toexplore changes in radiologists' ratings of 0.55 T images over time. Method:...
6.
Kelsey L, Seiberlich N, Bapuraj J, Rivas F, Masotti M, Gulani V, et al.
Eur Spine J
. 2025 Feb;
PMID: 39894833
Purpose: The aim of this study is to assess inter-reader agreement of imaging findings and compare readers' assessment of image quality (IQ) and appearance of metal artifact (MA) in patients...
7.
Kaur T, Jiang Y, Seiberlich N, Hussain H, Wells S, Wei J, et al.
Abdom Radiol (NY)
. 2025 Jan;
PMID: 39794536
Objective: In-bore MRI-guided biopsy allows direct visualization of suspicious lesions, biopsy needles, and trajectories, allowing accurate sampling when MRI-ultrasound fusion biopsy is not feasible. However, its use has been limited....
8.
Keenan K, Tasdelen B, Javed A, Ramasawmy R, Rizzo R, Martin M, et al.
Magn Reson Med
. 2024 Sep;
93(1):289-300.
PMID: 39219179
Purpose: To compare T1 and T2 measurements across commercial and prototype 0.55T MRI systems in both phantom and healthy participants using the same vendor-neutral pulse sequences, reconstruction, and analysis methods....
9.
Lavrova A, Seiberlich N, Kelsey L, Richardson J, Comer J, Masotti M, et al.
Eur J Radiol
. 2024 Mar;
175:111406.
PMID: 38490129
Purpose: To compare image quality, assess inter-reader variability, and evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of routine clinical lumbar spine sequences at 0.55T compared with those collected at 1.5/3T to assess common...
10.
Ramachandran A, Hussain H, Gulani V, Kelsey L, Mendiratta-Lala M, Richardson J, et al.
Acad Radiol
. 2024 Feb;
31(8):3177-3190.
PMID: 38320946
Rationale And Objectives: This study aims to assess the quality of abdominal MR images acquired on a commercial 0.55T scanner and compare these images with those acquired on conventional 1.5T/3T...