» Authors » Nicola Mendick

Nicola Mendick

Explore the profile of Nicola Mendick including associated specialties, affiliations and a list of published articles. Areas
Snapshot
Articles 6
Citations 70
Followers 0
Related Specialties
Co-Authors
Published In
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Recent Articles
1.
Mendick N, Young B, Holcombe C, Salmon P
Med Educ . 2015 Mar; 49(4):408-16. PMID: 25800301
Context: Communication education has become integral to pre- and post-qualification clinical curricula, but it is not informed by research into how practitioners think that good communication arises. Objectives: This study...
2.
Mendick N, Young B, Holcombe C, Salmon P
Psychooncology . 2013 Aug; 22(10):2364-71. PMID: 23904068
Objective: Cancer clinicians are routinely criticised for communicating information poorly to patients, but expert guidance is sometimes contradictory or impractical. We wanted to understand how, and how well, breast cancer...
3.
Mendick N, Young B, Holcombe C, Salmon P
World J Surg . 2011 Aug; 35(10):2187-95. PMID: 21853359
Background: Although clinicians are often criticized for giving inadequate information to patients with cancer, current recommendations to "provide full information" or "all the information patients want" are impractical. We therefore...
4.
Salmon P, Mendick N, Young B
Patient Educ Couns . 2010 Nov; 82(3):448-54. PMID: 21111558
Objective: We developed a method whereby relationships can be studied simultaneously from the perspectives of each party and researchers' observations of their dialogue. Then we used this method to study...
5.
Pegman S, Beesley H, Holcombe C, Mendick N, Salmon P
Patient Educ Couns . 2010 Aug; 83(1):125-8. PMID: 20684871
Objective: We examined to what extent variability in breast cancer patients' sense of relationship with their surgeons was attributable to patient vs surgeon variation and we examined the role of...
6.
Mendick N, Young B, Holcombe C, Salmon P
Soc Sci Med . 2010 Apr; 70(12):1904-1911. PMID: 20382463
Doctors are widely encouraged to share decision-making with patients. However, the assumption that responsibility for decisions is an objective quantity that can be apportioned between doctors and patients is problematic....