Bradford Coffee
Overview
Explore the profile of Bradford Coffee including associated specialties, affiliations and a list of published articles.
Author names and details appear as published. Due to indexing inconsistencies, multiple individuals may share a name, and a single author may have variations. MedLuna displays this data as publicly available, without modification or verification
Snapshot
Snapshot
Articles
30
Citations
688
Followers
0
Related Specialties
Related Specialties
Top 10 Co-Authors
Top 10 Co-Authors
Published In
Published In
Affiliations
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Recent Articles
1.
Pan S, Cox H, Willmott J, Mundt E, Gorringe H, Landon M, et al.
Front Oncol
. 2023 Feb;
13:1069467.
PMID: 36793599
Background And Aims: Tumor immunohistochemical staining (IHC) of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) proteins is often used to guide germline genetic testing and variant classification for patients with suspected Lynch syndrome....
2.
Nix P, Mundt E, Manley S, Coffee B, Roa B
JCO Precis Oncol
. 2022 Jan;
4:1224-1225.
PMID: 35050779
No abstract available.
3.
Nix P, Mundt E, Manley S, Coffee B, Roa B
JCO Precis Oncol
. 2022 Jan;
4:730-735.
PMID: 35050751
No abstract available.
4.
Nix P, Mundt E, Coffee B, Goossen E, Warf B, Brown K, et al.
Fam Cancer
. 2021 Jan;
21(1):7-19.
PMID: 33469799
A substantial proportion of pathogenic variants associated with an increased risk of hereditary cancer are sequence variants affecting RNA splicing. The classification of these variants can be complex when both...
5.
Coffee B, Cox H, Bernhisel R, Manley S, Bowles K, Roa B, et al.
Hum Mutat
. 2019 Sep;
41(1):203-211.
PMID: 31490007
Previous analysis of next-generation sequencing (NGS) hereditary pan-cancer panel testing demonstrated that approximately 40% of TP53 pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants (PVs) detected have NGS allele frequencies between 10% and...
6.
Slavin T, Coffee B, Bernhisel R, Logan J, Cox H, Marcucci G, et al.
Cancer Genet
. 2019 May;
235-236:31-38.
PMID: 31056428
Next-generation sequencing (NGS) hereditary pan-cancer panel testing can identify somatic variants, which exhibit lower allele frequencies than do germline variants and may confound hereditary cancer predisposition testing. This analysis examined...
7.
Bowles K, Mancini-DiNardo D, Coffee B, Cox H, Qian Y, Elias M, et al.
Future Oncol
. 2018 Aug;
15(1):65-79.
PMID: 30113232
Expanded genetic test utilization to guide cancer management has driven the development of larger gene panels and greater diversity in the patient population pursuing testing, resulting in increased identification of...
8.
Pasquali M, Yu C, Coffee B
Genet Med
. 2017 Dec;
20(1):3-11.
PMID: 29261178
Disclaimer: These ACMG Standards and Guidelines are developed primarily as an educational resource for clinical laboratory geneticists to help them provide quality clinical laboratory genetic services. Adherence to these Standards...
9.
Qian Y, Mancini-DiNardo D, Judkins T, Cox H, Brown K, Elias M, et al.
Cancer Genet
. 2017 Oct;
216-217:159-169.
PMID: 29025590
Cancer risks have been previously reported for some retrotransposon element (RE) insertions; however, detection of these insertions is technically challenging and very few oncogenic RE insertions have been reported. Here...
10.
Coffee B, Cox H, Kidd J, Sizemore S, Brown K, Manley S, et al.
Cancer Genet
. 2017 Mar;
211:5-8.
PMID: 28279308
Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) multigene panels, which are routinely used to assess hereditary cancer risk, can detect both inherited germline variants and somatic variants in cancer-risk genes. We evaluated the...