Evaluation of Cardiac Structures and Function in Small Experimental Animals: Transthoracic, Transesophageal, and Intraventricular Echocardiography to Assess Contractile Function in Rat Heart
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Objectives: The efficacy of three different echocardiographic techniques to assess cardiac structures and function in the rat heart was studied.
Background: With increasing costs for large animal studies there is need for improved assessment of ventricular function in small animal models.
Methods: Transthoracic, transesophageal, or intracavitary echocardiography was performed in 138 rats using either a pediatric or an intravascular ultrasound transducer in control, infarcted, and obese rats. Left ventricular dimensions and wall thickness were measured.
Results: Transthoracic echocardiography allows qualitative and quantitative estimation of cardiac dimensions and ventricular function. End-diastolic and end-systolic diameters were 0.53 +/- 0.08 and 0.26 +/- 0.05 cm in controls, 0.63 +/- 0.08 and 0.41 +/- 0.07 cm in infarcted (p < 0.001 vs controls), and 0.66 +/- 0.1 and 0.21 +/- 0.07 cm in obese rats (p < 0.01 vs controls). Fractional shortening was 52 +/- 6% in controls, 36 +/- 5% in infarcted (p < 0.001), and 68 +/- 9% in obese rats (p < 0.001). Wall thickness was increased in obese rats. Transesophageal echocardiography allows a qualitative rather than quantitative assessment. Intracavitary ultrasound enabled visualization of the endocardium. Following coronary occlusion, fractional shortening and ejection fraction were decreased (30.8 +/- 4.5 vs 44.4 +/- 4.7%, p < 0.005, and 46.7 +/- 8.5 vs 63.4 +/- 5.4%, p < 0.005, respectively).
Conclusions: Transthoracic echocardiography is a non-invasive technique to sufficiently provide information about cardiac structures and function, while transesophageal echocardiography allows rather a qualitative estimation of the rat heart. Intracavitary ultrasound can be used to assess the endocardium, ventricular function, and dimensions in open-chest studies in rats.
Landes R, Li C, Sridharan V, Bergom C, Boerma M Int J Radiat Biol. 2023; 100(1):28-36.
PMID: 37603396 PMC: 10843572. DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2023.2242937.
Alsaied T, Omar K, James J, Hinton R, Crombleholme T, Habli M Pediatr Res. 2017; 81(6):919-925.
PMID: 28099426 DOI: 10.1038/pr.2017.18.
Boros K, Jancso G, Dux M, Fekecs Z, Bencsik P, Oszlacs O Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2016; 389(9):1009-20.
PMID: 27342418 DOI: 10.1007/s00210-016-1267-x.
Nguyen T, Sovari A, Pezhouman A, Iyer S, Cao H, Ko C J Physiol. 2016; 594(6):1689-707.
PMID: 26775607 PMC: 4799964. DOI: 10.1113/JP271318.
Hoffmann L, Kretschmer A, Lawrenz B, Hocher B, Stasch J PLoS One. 2015; 10(12):e0145048.
PMID: 26717150 PMC: 4700984. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145048.