» Articles » PMID: 9852598

Extraocular Motor Unit and Whole-muscle Responses in the Lateral Rectus Muscle of the Squirrel Monkey

Overview
Journal J Neurosci
Specialty Neurology
Date 1998 Dec 16
PMID 9852598
Citations 33
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Because primate studies provide data for the current experimental models of the human oculomotor system, we investigated the relationship of lateral rectus muscle motoneuron firing to muscle unit contractile characteristics in the squirrel monkey. Also examined was the correlation of whole-muscle contractile force with the degree of evoked eye displacement. A force transducer was used to record lateral rectus whole-muscle or muscle unit contraction in response to abducens whole-nerve stimulation or stimulation of single abducens motoneurons or axons. Horizontal eye displacement was recorded using a magnetic search coil. (1) Motor units could be categorized based on contraction speed (fusion frequency) and fatigue. (2) The kt value (change in motoneuronal firing necessary to increase motor unit force by 1.0 mg) of the units correlated with maximum tetanic tension. (3) There was some tendency for maximum tetanic tension of this unit population to separate into three groups. (4) At a constant frequency of 100 Hz, 95% of the motor units demonstrated significantly different force levels dependent on immediately previous stimulation history (hysteresis). (5) A mean force change of 0.32 gm/ degrees and a mean frequency change of 4.7 Hz/ degrees of eye displacement were observed in response to whole-nerve stimulation. These quantitative data provide the first contractile measures of primate extraocular motor units. Models of eye movement dynamics may need to consider the nonlinear transformations observed between stimulation rate and muscle tension as well as the probability that as few as two to three motor units can deviate the eye 1 degrees.

Citing Articles

Ion channel profiles of extraocular motoneurons and internuclear neurons in human abducens and trochlear nuclei.

Mayadali U, Chertes C, Sinicina I, Shaikh A, Horn A Front Neuroanat. 2024; 18:1411154.

PMID: 38957435 PMC: 11217180. DOI: 10.3389/fnana.2024.1411154.


Investigation of Selective Innervation of Extraocular Muscle Compartments.

Adade S, Das V Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2023; 64(2):24.

PMID: 36820678 PMC: 9970002. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.64.2.24.


Extraocular Motoneurons and Neurotrophism.

Pastor A, Blumer R, de la Cruz R Adv Neurobiol. 2022; 28:281-319.

PMID: 36066830 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-07167-6_12.


Firing rate trajectories of human occipitofrontalis motor units in response to triangular voluntary contraction intensity.

Kirk E, Zero A, Rice C Exp Brain Res. 2021; 239(12):3661-3670.

PMID: 34617127 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-021-06238-x.


The relationship of agonist muscle single motor unit firing rates and elbow extension limb movement kinematics.

Kirk E, Rice C Exp Brain Res. 2021; 239(9):2755-2766.

PMID: 34240233 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-021-06168-8.


References
1.
Shall M, Goldberg S . Extraocular motor units: type classification and motoneuron stimulation frequency-muscle unit force relationships. Brain Res. 1992; 587(2):291-300. DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(92)91010-c. View

2.
Barmack N, BELL C, Rence B . Tension and rate of tension development during isometric responses of extraocular muscle. J Neurophysiol. 1971; 34(6):1072-9. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1971.34.6.1072. View

3.
Shall M, Wilson K, Goldberg S . Extraocular motoneuron stimulation frequency effects on motor unit tension in cat. Acta Anat (Basel). 1996; 157(3):217-25. DOI: 10.1159/000147884. View

4.
Spencer R, Porter J . Structural organization of the extraocular muscles. Rev Oculomot Res. 1988; 2:33-79. View

5.
Judge S, Richmond B, Chu F . Implantation of magnetic search coils for measurement of eye position: an improved method. Vision Res. 1980; 20(6):535-8. DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(80)90128-5. View