» Articles » PMID: 9826598

Amino Acid-activated Channels in the Catfish Taste System

Overview
Journal Biophys J
Publisher Cell Press
Specialty Biophysics
Date 1998 Nov 25
PMID 9826598
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Membrane vesicles derived from external taste epithelia of channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) were incorporated into lipid bilayers on the tips of patch pipettes. Consistent with previous experiments (Teeter, J. H., J. G. Brand, and T. Kumazawa. 1990. Biophys. J. 58:253-259), micromolar (0.5-200 microM) concentrations of L-arginine (L-Arg), a potent taste stimulus for catfish, activated a nonselective cation conductance in some bilayers, which was antagonized by D-Arg. Two classes of L-Arg-gated receptor/channels were observed in reconstituted taste epithelial membranes: one with a unitary conductance of 40-60 pS, and the other with a conductance of 75-100 pS. A separate class of nonselective cation channels, with a conductance of 50-65 pS, was activated by high concentrations of L-proline (L-Pro) (0.1-3 mM), which is the range necessary to elicit neural responses in catfish taste fibers. The L-Pro-activated channels were not affected by either L- or D-Arg, but were blocked by millimolar concentrations of D-Pro. Conversely, neither L- nor D-Pro altered the activity of either class of L-Arg-activated channels, which were blocked by micromolar concentrations of D-Arg. These results are consistent with biochemical, neurophysiological, and behavioral studies indicating that taste responses of channel catfish to L-Arg are mediated by high-affinity receptors that are part of or closely coupled to nonselective cation channels directly gated by low concentrations of L-Arg, while responses to L-Pro are mediated by distinct, low-affinity receptors also associated with nonselective cation channels.

Citing Articles

A chromosome-level genome of electric catfish () provided new insights into order Siluriformes evolution.

Liu M, Song Y, Zhang S, Yu L, Yuan Z, Yang H Mar Life Sci Technol. 2024; 6(1):1-14.

PMID: 38433969 PMC: 10901758. DOI: 10.1007/s42995-023-00197-8.


Genetics of taste receptors.

Bachmanov A, Bosak N, Lin C, Matsumoto I, Ohmoto M, Reed D Curr Pharm Des. 2013; 20(16):2669-83.

PMID: 23886383 PMC: 4764331. DOI: 10.2174/13816128113199990566.


Construction of a taste-blind medaka fish and quantitative assay of its preference-aversion behavior.

Aihara Y, Yasuoka A, Iwamoto S, Yoshida Y, Misaka T, Abe K Genes Brain Behav. 2008; 7(8):924-32.

PMID: 18700838 PMC: 2667311. DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-183X.2008.00433.x.


Biochemical enrichment and biophysical characterization of a taste receptor for L-arginine from the catfish, Ictalurus puntatus.

Grosvenor W, Kaulin Y, Spielman A, Bayley D, Kalinoski D, Teeter J BMC Neurosci. 2004; 5:25.

PMID: 15282034 PMC: 511074. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2202-5-25.


Effect of extracellular Ca2+ on the quinine-activated current of bullfrog taste receptor cells.

Tsunenari T, Kaneko A J Physiol. 2001; 530(Pt 2):235-41.

PMID: 11208971 PMC: 2278402. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2001.0235l.x.


References
1.
Krueger J, CAGAN R . Biochemical studies of tast sensation. Binding of L-[3H]alanine to a sedimentable fraction from catfish barbel epithelium. J Biol Chem. 1976; 251(1):88-97. View

2.
Ruiz-Avila L, McLaughlin S, Wildman D, McKinnon P, Robichon A, Spickofsky N . Coupling of bitter receptor to phosphodiesterase through transducin in taste receptor cells. Nature. 1995; 376(6535):80-5. DOI: 10.1038/376080a0. View

3.
Schiffman S, Lockhead E, Maes F . Amiloride reduces the taste intensity of Na+ and Li+ salts and sweeteners. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983; 80(19):6136-40. PMC: 534376. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.80.19.6136. View

4.
Coronado R, Latorre R . Phospholipid bilayers made from monolayers on patch-clamp pipettes. Biophys J. 1983; 43(2):231-6. PMC: 1329252. DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(83)84343-4. View

5.
Heck G, Mierson S, DeSimone J . Salt taste transduction occurs through an amiloride-sensitive sodium transport pathway. Science. 1984; 223(4634):403-5. DOI: 10.1126/science.6691151. View