A Clinical Comparison of Transscleral Cyclophotocoagulation with Neodymium: YAG and Semiconductor Diode Lasers
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Purpose: To compare the efficacy of transscleral cyclophotocoagulation using a neodymium: YAG (Nd:YAG) or semiconductor diode laser in controlling intraocular pressure in patients with refractory glaucoma.
Methods: In a prospective study, 95 eyes of 91 patients with refractory glaucoma randomly received Nd:YAG or diode cyclophotocoagulation. Patients were followed for a mean of 10.4 months (10.42 +/- 3.16, mean +/- SD). We compared available data preoperatively and at 1 week, 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively. Data analyzed were corrected visual acuity, intraocular pressure, and the type of glaucoma.
Results: There was a statistically significant decrease in intraocular pressure after both Nd:YAG and diode cyclophotocoagulation at each time period. However, there were no significant differences in postoperative intraocular pressure or visual acuity change between Nd:YAG and diode procedures.
Conclusions: Compared with the Nd:YAG laser for transscleral cyclophotocoagulation, the diode laser has technological advantages including portability, durability, and smaller size, while providing equivalent postoperative intraocular pressure and visual acuity change.
Raja V, Balasubramaniam N, Sundar B, Nagdev N Indian J Ophthalmol. 2023; 72(3):397-401.
PMID: 38099577 PMC: 11001240. DOI: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_1129_23.
Cyclodestructive procedures for refractory glaucoma.
Chen M, Kim C, Coleman A Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019; 3:CD012223.
PMID: 30852841 PMC: 6409080. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012223.pub2.
Cyclodestructive Procedures in Glaucoma: A Review of Current and Emerging Options.
Dastiridou A, Katsanos A, Denis P, Francis B, Mikropoulos D, Teus M Adv Ther. 2018; 35(12):2103-2127.
PMID: 30448885 PMC: 6267695. DOI: 10.1007/s12325-018-0837-3.
Kumar H, Mansoori T, Warjri G, Somarajan B, Bandil S, Gupta V Indian J Ophthalmol. 2018; 66(11):1539-1553.
PMID: 30355858 PMC: 6213662. DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_555_18.
Rodriguez-Garcia A, Gonzalez-Gonzalez L, Alvarez-Guzman J Int Ophthalmol. 2015; 36(3):373-83.
PMID: 26419547 DOI: 10.1007/s10792-015-0130-2.