» Articles » PMID: 26419547

Trans-scleral Diode Laser Cyclophotocoagulation for Refractory Glaucoma After High-risk Penetrating Keratoplasty

Overview
Journal Int Ophthalmol
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2015 Oct 1
PMID 26419547
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To analyze the intraocular pressure reduction, number of anti-glaucoma medications needed, and post-operative complications of trans-scleral diode laser cyclophotocoagulation (DCPC) in patients with high-risk penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) and secondary refractory glaucoma. Prospective interventional, longitudinal, non-comparative series of cases, including 16 eyes of 15 patient's post-PKP on maximal anti-glaucoma medical therapy with intraocular pressures above 22 mmHg. All patients received 18 shots, 360° peri-limbal (avoiding the long posterior ciliary nerves and arteries at 3 and 9 o'clock positions) of trans-scleral DCPC (2000 mW, time: 2.0 s/shot). There was a 55.5 % reduction (total of 14.0 mmHg) of the mean pre-operative IOP (31.5 mmHg) after the first diode laser application (p = 0.0020). Re-treatment was required in 31.2 % of eyes over a mean period of 10.7 months. In these five eyes, the mean pre-operative IOP was 40.4 mmHg, which decreased to 15.0 mmHg post-therapy, and a mean IOP reduction of 25.4 mmHg (p = 0.0218). There was a 51.0 % reduction in the mean number of medications used after the first, and a 57.1 % reduction after a second laser application. The incidence of failure (IOP ≥ 22 mmHg or need of additional medical therapy) from initial intervention to loss of follow-up was 1.3 % per person-month. DCPC effectively reduces the intraocular pressure and the number of anti-glaucoma medications with few complications in patients after high-risk PKP and secondary glaucoma. Only, one-third of the eyes needed a second intervention to control the intraocular pressure. Post-DCPC complications were limited to phthisis bulbi and endothelial dysfunction, one eye each. Please check and confirm the author names and initials are correct. Also, kindly confirm the details in the metadata are correct.

Citing Articles

Mechanism and treatment of secondary glaucoma after corneal transplantation: a review.

Lin Y, Gou Q, Yu P, Wu Z, Zeng L, Chen H Front Ophthalmol (Lausanne). 2024; 4:1361704.

PMID: 38984120 PMC: 11182254. DOI: 10.3389/fopht.2024.1361704.


Surgical management of glaucoma following different keratoplasty techniques.

Oztutuncu O, Altan C, Gumus G, Solmaz B, Basarir B, Alagoz N Int Ophthalmol. 2022; 42(9):2829-2840.

PMID: 35366139 DOI: 10.1007/s10792-022-02273-x.


Lasers in Glaucoma: an Overview.

Saha B, Kumari R, Sinha B, Ambasta A, Kumar S Int Ophthalmol. 2020; 41(3):1111-1128.

PMID: 33211223 DOI: 10.1007/s10792-020-01654-4.


Cyclodestructive Procedures in Glaucoma: A Review of Current and Emerging Options.

Dastiridou A, Katsanos A, Denis P, Francis B, Mikropoulos D, Teus M Adv Ther. 2018; 35(12):2103-2127.

PMID: 30448885 PMC: 6267695. DOI: 10.1007/s12325-018-0837-3.


Lasers in glaucoma.

Kumar H, Mansoori T, Warjri G, Somarajan B, Bandil S, Gupta V Indian J Ophthalmol. 2018; 66(11):1539-1553.

PMID: 30355858 PMC: 6213662. DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_555_18.


References
1.
Malik R, Ellingham R, Suleman H, Morgan W . Refractory glaucoma--tube or diode?. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2006; 34(8):771-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2006.01339.x. View

2.
Al-Mohaimeed M, Al-Shahwan S, Al-Torbak A, Wagoner M . Escalation of glaucoma therapy after penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 2007; 114(12):2281-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.08.043. View

3.
Yildirim N, Gursoy H, Sahin A, Ozer A, Colak E . Glaucoma after penetrating keratoplasty: incidence, risk factors, and management. J Ophthalmol. 2011; 2011:951294. PMC: 3235813. DOI: 10.1155/2011/951294. View

4.
Peyman G, Naguib K, Gaasterland D . Trans-scleral application of a semiconductor diode laser. Lasers Surg Med. 1990; 10(6):569-75. DOI: 10.1002/lsm.1900100609. View

5.
Dada T, Aggarwal A, Minudath K, Vanathi M, Choudhary S, Gupta V . Post-penetrating keratoplasty glaucoma. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2008; 56(4):269-77. PMC: 2636159. DOI: 10.4103/0301-4738.41410. View