» Articles » PMID: 9772253

Corticomotoneuronal Postspike Effects in Shoulder, Elbow, Wrist, Digit, and Intrinsic Hand Muscles During a Reach and Prehension Task

Overview
Journal J Neurophysiol
Specialties Neurology
Physiology
Date 1998 Oct 17
PMID 9772253
Citations 101
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We used spike-triggered averaging of rectified electromyographic activity to determine whether corticomotoneuronal (CM) cells produce postspike effects in muscles of both proximal and distal forelimb joints in monkeys performing a reach and prehension task. Two monkeys were trained to perform a self-paced task in which they reached forward from a starting position to retrieve a food reward from a small cylindrical well. We compiled spike-triggered averages from 22 to 24 separate forelimb muscles at both proximal (shoulder, elbow) and distal (wrist, digits, intrinsic hand) joints. Of 174 cells examined, 112 produced postspike effects in at least one of the target muscles. Of those cells, 45.5% produced postspike effects in both proximal and distal forelimb muscles. A nearly equal number (44.7%) produced postspike effects in distal muscles only, whereas a clear minority (9.8%) produced postspike effects in only proximal muscles. The majority of CM cells (71.4%) produced effects in two or more muscles, with an average muscle field of 3.1 +/- 2.1 (mean +/- SD) for facilitation plus suppression. Of 345 postspike effects identified, 70.7% were facilitation effects and 29.3% were suppression effects. The large majority of effects (72.2%) were in distal muscles. When averaged by joint, the latency and peak magnitude of postspike facilitation showed a stepwise increase from proximal to distal joints. The results of this study show that the majority of CM cells engaged in coordinated forelimb reaching movements facilitate and/or suppress muscles at multiple joints, including muscles at both proximal and distal joints. The results also show that CM cells make more frequent and more potent terminations in motoneuron pools of distal compared with proximal muscles.

Citing Articles

Corticospinal and corticoreticulospinal projections have discrete but complementary roles in chronic motor behaviors after stroke.

Taga M, Hong Y, Charalambous C, Raju S, Hayes L, Lin J J Neurophysiol. 2024; 132(6):1917-1936.

PMID: 39503588 PMC: 11687835. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00301.2024.


New insights into muscle activity associated with phantom hand movements in transhumeral amputees.

Chateaux M, Rossel O, Verite F, Nicol C, Touillet A, Paysant J Front Hum Neurosci. 2024; 18:1443833.

PMID: 39281369 PMC: 11392834. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1443833.


Evolution, biomechanics, and neurobiology converge to explain selective finger motor control.

Xu J, Mawase F, Schieber M Physiol Rev. 2024; 104(3):983-1020.

PMID: 38385888 PMC: 11380997. DOI: 10.1152/physrev.00030.2023.


Home-based arm cycling exercise improves trunk control in persons with incomplete spinal cord injury: an observational study.

van Helden J, Alexander E, Cabral H, Strutton P, Martinez-Valdes E, Falla D Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):22120.

PMID: 38092831 PMC: 10719287. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-49053-w.


Terminal organization of the corticospinal projection from the arm/hand region of the rostral primary motor cortex (M1r or old M1) to the cervical enlargement (C5-T1) in rhesus monkey.

Morecraft R, Ge J, Stilwell-Morecraft K, Lemon R, Ganguly K, Darling W J Comp Neurol. 2023; 531(18):1996-2018.

PMID: 37938897 PMC: 10842044. DOI: 10.1002/cne.25557.