» Articles » PMID: 9742175

Ascending Projections of Simple and Complex Cells in Layer 6 of the Cat Striate Cortex

Overview
Journal J Neurosci
Specialty Neurology
Date 1998 Sep 19
PMID 9742175
Citations 27
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Receptive field properties vary systematically across the different layers of the cat striate cortex. Understanding how these functional differences emerge requires a precise description of the interlaminar connections and the quality of information that they transmit. This study examines the contribution of the two physiological types of neuron in layer 6, simple and complex, to the cortical microcircuit. The approach was to make whole-cell recordings with dye-filled electrodes in vivo to correlate visual response property with intracortical projection pattern. The two simple cells we stained projected to layer 4, as previously reported (Gilbert and Wiesel, 1979; Martin and Whitteridge, 1984). Six of the eight complex cells that we labeled projected to the superficial layers, a pathway not previously described in the cat. The remaining two cells targeted the infragranular layers. Layer 4 is dominated by simple cells, whereas layers 5 and 2+3 are mainly composed of complex cells (Hubel and Wiesel, 1962; Gilbert, 1977). Hence, our results indicate that the ascending projections of simple cells in layer 6 target other simple cells. In parallel, the ascending projections of a population of complex cells in layer 6 favor other complex cells. Anatomical experiments in several species (Lund and Boothe,1975; Burkhalter,1989; Usrey and Fitzpatrick, 1996; Wiser and Callaway, 1996) had also demonstrated that layer 6 gives rise to two separate intracortical pathways. Pooling the results of these anatomical studies with our own suggests a common feature of the laminar organization: cells that project to different intracortical targets have distinct functional characteristics.

Citing Articles

A strong direct link from the layer 3/4 border to layer 6 of cat primary visual cortex.

Martin K, Sagesser F Brain Struct Funct. 2024; 229(6):1397-1415.

PMID: 38753019 PMC: 11176106. DOI: 10.1007/s00429-024-02806-3.


Spatial Attention Modulates Neuronal Interactions between Simple and Complex Cells in V1.

Zheng Z, Hu Q, Bu X, Jiang H, Sui X, Li L Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(9).

PMID: 37175939 PMC: 10179430. DOI: 10.3390/ijms24098229.


An Anatomically Constrained Model of V1 Simple Cells Predicts the Coexistence of Push-Pull and Broad Inhibition.

Taylor M, Contreras D, Destexhe A, Fregnac Y, Antolik J J Neurosci. 2021; 41(37):7797-7812.

PMID: 34321313 PMC: 8445056. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0928-20.2021.


An Attempt at a Unified Theory of the Neocortical Microcircuit in Sensory Cortex.

Bennett M Front Neural Circuits. 2020; 14:40.

PMID: 32848632 PMC: 7416357. DOI: 10.3389/fncir.2020.00040.


Progress in automating patch clamp cellular physiology.

Annecchino L, Schultz S Brain Neurosci Adv. 2020; 2:2398212818776561.

PMID: 32166142 PMC: 7058203. DOI: 10.1177/2398212818776561.


References
1.
Bullier J, HENRY G . Laminar distribution of first-order neurons and afferent terminals in cat striate cortex. J Neurophysiol. 1979; 42(5):1271-81. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1979.42.5.1271. View

2.
Conley M, Raczkowski D . Sublaminar organization within layer VI of the striate cortex in Galago. J Comp Neurol. 1990; 302(2):425-36. DOI: 10.1002/cne.903020218. View

3.
Hoffman K, Stone J . Conduction velocity of afferents to cat visual cortex: a correlation with cortical receptive field properties. Brain Res. 1971; 32(2):460-6. DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(71)90340-4. View

4.
Levay S, Gilbert C . Laminar patterns of geniculocortical projection in the cat. Brain Res. 1976; 113(1):1-19. DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(76)90002-0. View

5.
Hubel D, Wiesel T . Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. J Physiol. 1962; 160:106-54. PMC: 1359523. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006837. View