» Articles » PMID: 9729918

A Survey of Wind Speeds in Indoor Workplaces

Overview
Journal Ann Occup Hyg
Date 1998 Sep 8
PMID 9729918
Citations 38
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The applicability of the inhalable convention for sampling aerosols relies on its being a valid model for typical sampling environments. The current convention is based on measurements carried out in external wind speeds between 1 and 4 m.s-1. However these measurements show a degree of wind speed dependence, and it is uncertain at present how valid the convention is for describing human aspiration efficiency outside these wind speed limits. Following concerns that wind speeds in many indoor workplaces may be significantly below this range, measurements have been made in 55 work areas covering a wide range of workplaces. Measurements have concentrated on 'background' wind speeds where the influence of specific air movement sources is minimised. The pooled wind speed measurements show a highly skewed distribution with an arithmetic mean of approximately 0.3 m.s-1. Approximately 85% of all individual measurements were below this mean value. No obvious correlation was found between wind speed distribution parameters and industry type, room size or ventilation type. A limited number of comparisons were made between static anemometers and devices mounted on workers. It was found that modal wind speeds experience by workers were typically 0.05 m.s-1 higher than those measured using a static anemometer. These measurements agreed well with previously published data for similar workplaces as well as houses.

Citing Articles

Assessment of exposure determinants and exposure levels by using stationary concentration measurements and a probabilistic near-field/far-field exposure model.

Koivisto A, Spinazze A, Verdonck F, Borghi F, Londahl J, Koponen I Open Res Eur. 2023; 1:72.

PMID: 37645135 PMC: 10446057. DOI: 10.12688/openreseurope.13752.1.


Quantitative evaluation of precautions against the COVID-19 indoor transmission through human coughing.

Nie Z, Chen Y, Deng M Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):22573.

PMID: 36585431 PMC: 9803700. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-26837-0.


Indicators to assess physiological heat strain - Part 1: Systematic review.

Ioannou L, Mantzios K, Tsoutsoubi L, Notley S, Dinas P, Brearley M Temperature (Austin). 2022; 9(3):227-262.

PMID: 36211945 PMC: 9542768. DOI: 10.1080/23328940.2022.2037376.


COVID-19 Exposure Assessment Tool (CEAT): Exposure quantification based on ventilation, infection prevalence, group characteristics, and behavior.

Schimmoller B, Trovao N, Isbell M, Goel C, Heck B, Archer T Sci Adv. 2022; 8(39):eabq0593.

PMID: 36179034 PMC: 9524836. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abq0593.


Covid-19 Exposure Assessment Tool (CEAT): Easy-to-use tool to quantify exposure based on airflow, group behavior, and infection prevalence in the community.

Schimmoller B, Trovao N, Isbell M, Goel C, Heck B, Archer T medRxiv. 2022; .

PMID: 35291295 PMC: 8923112. DOI: 10.1101/2022.03.02.22271806.