» Articles » PMID: 29683781

Laboratory Evaluation of a Low-cost, Real-time, Aerosol Multi-sensor

Overview
Publisher Informa Healthcare
Date 2018 Apr 24
PMID 29683781
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Exposure to occupational aerosols are a known hazard in many industry sectors and can be a risk factor for several respiratory diseases. In this study, a laboratory evaluation of low-cost aerosol sensors, the Dylos DC1700 and a modified Dylos known as the Utah Modified Dylos Sensor (UMDS), was performed to assess the sensors' efficiency in sampling respirable and inhalable dust at high concentrations, which are most common in occupational settings. Dust concentrations were measured in a low-speed wind tunnel with 3 UMDSs, collocated with an aerosol spectrometer (Grimm 1.109) and gravimetric respirable and inhalable samplers. A total of 10 tests consisting of 5 different concentrations and 2 test aerosols, Arizona road dust and aluminum oxide, were conducted. For the Arizona road dust, total particle count was strongly related between the spectrometer and the UMDS with a coefficient of determination (R) between 0.86-0.92. Particle count concentrations measured with the UMDS were converted to mass and also were related with gravimetrically collected inhalable and respirable dust. The UMDS small bin (i.e., all particles) compared to the inhalable sampler yielded an R of 0.86-0.92, and the large bin subtracted from the small bin (i.e., only the smallest particles) compared to the respirable sampler yielded an R of 0.93-0.997. Tests with the aluminum oxide demonstrated a substantially lower relationship across all comparisons. Furthermore, assessment of intra-instrument variability was consistent for all instruments, but inter-instrument variability indicated that each instrument requires its own calibration equation to yield accurate exposure estimates. Overall, it appears that the UMDS can be used as a low-cost tool to estimate respirable and inhalable concentrations found in many workplaces. Future studies will focus on deployment of a UMDS network in an occupational setting.

Citing Articles

Aerosol Measurement Degradation in Low-Cost Particle Sensors Using Laboratory Calibration and Field Validation.

Peck A, Handy R, Sleeth D, Schaefer C, Zhang Y, Pahler L Toxics. 2023; 11(1).

PMID: 36668782 PMC: 9862639. DOI: 10.3390/toxics11010056.


Using dynamic time warping self-organizing maps to characterize diurnal patterns in environmental exposures.

Li K, Sward K, Deng H, Morrison J, Habre R, Franklin M Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):24052.

PMID: 34912034 PMC: 8674322. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-03515-1.


W-TSS: A Wavelet-Based Algorithm for Discovering Time Series Shapelets.

Li K, Deng H, Morrison J, Habre R, Franklin M, Chiang Y Sensors (Basel). 2021; 21(17).

PMID: 34502692 PMC: 8434226. DOI: 10.3390/s21175801.


Indoor Air Quality Issues for Rocky Mountain West Tribes.

Webb L, Sleeth D, Handy R, Stenberg J, Schaefer C, Collingwood S Front Public Health. 2021; 9:606430.

PMID: 33748060 PMC: 7973111. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.606430.


Biomass-fuelled improved cookstove intervention to prevent household air pollution in Northwest Ethiopia: a cluster randomized controlled trial.

Adane M, Alene G, Mereta S Environ Health Prev Med. 2021; 26(1):1.

PMID: 33397282 PMC: 7783973. DOI: 10.1186/s12199-020-00923-z.


References
1.
Jones S, Anthony T, Sousan S, Altmaier R, Park J, Peters T . Evaluation of a Low-Cost Aerosol Sensor to Assess Dust Concentrations in a Swine Building. Ann Occup Hyg. 2016; 60(5):597-607. PMC: 4879606. DOI: 10.1093/annhyg/mew009. View

2.
OShaughnessy P, Slagley J . Photometer response determination based on aerosol physical characteristics. AIHA J (Fairfax, Va). 2003; 63(5):578-85. DOI: 10.1080/15428110208984743. View

3.
Ringen K, Dement J, Welch L, Dong X, Bingham E, Quinn P . Risks of a lifetime in construction. Part II: Chronic occupational diseases. Am J Ind Med. 2014; 57(11):1235-45. DOI: 10.1002/ajim.22366. View

4.
Steinle S, Reis S, Sabel C, Semple S, Twigg M, Braban C . Personal exposure monitoring of PM2.5 in indoor and outdoor microenvironments. Sci Total Environ. 2014; 508:383-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.12.003. View

5.
Schulte P . Characterizing the burden of occupational injury and disease. J Occup Environ Med. 2005; 47(6):607-22. DOI: 10.1097/01.jom.0000165086.25595.9d. View