» Articles » PMID: 9727340

Backside Nonconformity and Locking Restraints Affect Liner/shell Load Transfer Mechanisms and Relative Motion in Modular Acetabular Components for Total Hip Replacement

Overview
Journal J Biomech
Specialty Physiology
Date 1998 Sep 4
PMID 9727340
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Nonconformity between the polyethylene liner and the metal shell may exist in modular acetabular components by design, due to manufacturing tolerances, or from locking mechanisms that attach the polyethylene liner to the metal shell. Relative motion at the liner/shell interface has been associated with backside wear, which may contribute to osteolysis which has been clinically observed near screw holes. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of nonconformity and locking restraints on the liner/shell relative motion and load transfer mechanisms in a commercially available, metal-backed acetabular component with a polar fenestration. The finite element method was used to explore the hypothesis that backside nonconformity and locking restraints play important roles in long-term surface damage mechanisms that are unique to modular components, such as backside wear and liner extrusion through screw holes. The three-body quasi-static contact problem was solved using a commercially available explicit finite element code, which modeled contact between the femoral head, polyethylene liner, and the metal shell. Four sets of liner boundary conditions were investigated: no restraints, rim restraints, equatorial restraints, and both rim and equatorial restraints. The finite element model with a conforming shell predicted between 8.5 and 12.8 microm of incremental extrusion of the polyethylene through the polar fenestration, consistent with in vitro experiments of the same design under identical loading conditions. Furthermore, idealized rim and/or equatorial liner restraints were found to share up to 71% of the load across the liner/shell interface. Consequently, the results of this study demonstrate that backside nonconformity and locking restraints substantially influence backside relative motion as well as load transfer at the liner/shell interface.

Citing Articles

Comparison of Different Locking Mechanisms in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Relative Motion between Cup and Inlay.

Jaeger S, Uhler M, Schroeder S, Beckmann N, Braun S Materials (Basel). 2020; 13(6).

PMID: 32204382 PMC: 7142960. DOI: 10.3390/ma13061392.


Quantification of clearance and creep in acetabular wear measurements.

Saffarini M, Gregory T, Vandenbussche E Ann Transl Med. 2016; 4(7):131.

PMID: 27162781 PMC: 4842391. DOI: 10.21037/atm.2016.03.39.


Backside Wear Is Not Dependent on the Acetabular Socket Design in Crosslinked Polyethylene Liners.

Bali K, McCalden R, Naudie D, MacDonald S, Teeter M Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015; 474(2):374-82.

PMID: 26201422 PMC: 4709282. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-015-4471-y.


Successful long-term fixation and progression of osteolysis associated with first-generation cementless acetabular components retrieved post mortem.

Urban R, Hall D, Della Valle C, Wimmer M, Jacobs J, Galante J J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012; 94(20):1877-85.

PMID: 23079880 PMC: 3489071. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01507.


Direct comparison of polyethylene wear in cemented and uncemented acetabular cups.

Bjerkholt H, Hovik O, Reikeras O J Orthop Traumatol. 2010; 11(3):155-8.

PMID: 20811923 PMC: 2948124. DOI: 10.1007/s10195-010-0104-0.