» Articles » PMID: 9665987

Evaluation of the Biostar Chlamydia OIA Assay with Specimens from Women Attending a Sexually Transmitted Disease Clinic

Overview
Specialty Microbiology
Date 1998 Jul 17
PMID 9665987
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Chlamydia trachomatis infections are the most prevalent sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) in the United States. In acute-care settings such as clinics and emergency rooms, a desirable chlamydia screening assay should exhibit good sensitivity and good specificity and should provide test results while the patient is still present. The Biostar Chlamydia OIA (Biostar, Inc., Boulder, Colo.) is an optical immunoassay (OIA) that provides test results in less than 30 min and that uses a test format that allows office-based testing. This assay is performed entirely at room temperature without the need for rotators or other specialized equipment. The goal of this study was to compare the performance of the Biostar Chlamydia OIA for the detection of C. trachomatis with the performance of cell culture, direct fluorescent-antibody (DFA) assay (Syva MicroTrak; Syva Co., Palo Alto, Calif.), and PCR (Roche Amplicor Chlamydia trachomatis; Roche, Branchburg, N.J.) for the detection of C. trachomatis infections in women attending an urban STD clinic. For calculations of relative test performance (sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values), patient specimens that yielded positive results by two or more of the four assays (cell culture, DFA assay, PCR, and OIA) were classified as "true infections." By these criteria, 42 of 306 total specimens were classified as positive for C. trachomatis (positive prevalence, 13.7%), 11 (3.6%; 10 by PCR and 1 by DFA assay) were positive by a single assay, and 253 (82.7%) were negative by all four tests. All culture-positive specimens were also positive by at least one other assay. Among the culture-negative specimens, 14(5%) specimens were positive by two of the three non-culture-based assays used. By using the criterion that positivity by at least two of the tests indicated a true infection,the relative sensitivities were as follows: culture and PCR, 92.9% each; Biostar Chlamydia OIA, 73.8%; and DFA assay, 59.5%.

Citing Articles

Rapid point of care test for detecting urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in nonpregnant women and men at reproductive age.

Grillo-Ardila C, Torres M, Gaitan H Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020; 1:CD011708.

PMID: 31995238 PMC: 6988850. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011708.pub2.


Evaluation of Cortez OneStep Chlamydia Rapicard™ Insta Test for the Detection of in Pregnant Women at Mbare Polyclinic in Harare, Zimbabwe.

Stephen S, Muchaneta-Kubara C, Munjoma M, Mandozana G Int J MCH AIDS. 2017; 6(1):19-26.

PMID: 28798890 PMC: 5547222. DOI: 10.21106/ijma.150.


Point of care diagnostics for sexually transmitted infections: perspectives and advances.

Gaydos C, Hardick J Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2014; 12(6):657-72.

PMID: 24484215 PMC: 4065592. DOI: 10.1586/14787210.2014.880651.


Molecular Diagnosis of Sexually Transmitted Chlamydia trachomatis in the United States.

Harkins A, Munson E ISRN Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 2011:279149.

PMID: 21822498 PMC: 3148448. DOI: 10.5402/2011/279149.


What's the Point? How Point-of-Care STI Tests Can Impact Infected Patients.

Huppert J, Hesse E, Gaydos C Point Care. 2010; 9(1):36-46.

PMID: 20401167 PMC: 2853950. DOI: 10.1097/POC.0b013e3181d2d8cc.


References
1.
Pothier P, Kazmierczak A . Comparison of cell culture with two direct Chlamydia tests using immunofluorescence or enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Eur J Clin Microbiol. 1986; 5(5):569-72. DOI: 10.1007/BF02017707. View

2.
Baselski V, McNeeley S, Ryan G, Robison M . A comparison of nonculture-dependent methods for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infections in pregnant women. Obstet Gynecol. 1987; 70(1):47-52. View

3.
Howard C, Friedman D, Leete J, Christensen M . Correlation of the percent of positive Chlamydia trachomatis direct fluorescent antibody detection tests with the adequacy of specimen collection. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1991; 14(3):233-7. DOI: 10.1016/0732-8893(91)90037-g. View

4.
Kellogg J, Seiple J, Klinedinst J, Levisky J . Impact of endocervical specimen quality on apparent prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis infections diagnosed using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1991; 115(12):1223-7. View

5.
Viscidi R, Bobo L, Hook 3rd E, Quinn T . Transmission of Chlamydia trachomatis among sex partners assessed by polymerase chain reaction. J Infect Dis. 1993; 168(2):488-92. DOI: 10.1093/infdis/168.2.488. View