» Articles » PMID: 9654631

Somatosensory- and Motor-evoked Potential Monitoring Without a Wake-up Test During Idiopathic Scoliosis Surgery. An Accepted Standard of Care

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 1998 Jul 9
PMID 9654631
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Study Design: This was a retrospective study of 500 patients undergoing corrective surgery between 1987 and 1997 for spinal deformity caused by idiopathic scoliosis.

Objectives: To report the sensitivity and specificity of somatosensory-evoked and neurogenic motor-evoked potentials monitoring and the requirements for an intraoperative wake-up test for all idiopathic scoliosis surgeries at a single institution.

Summary Of Background Data: Intraoperative monitoring is recommended for use during corrective spinal surgery. Accepted monitoring standards and requirements for an intraoperative wake-up test are still debated.

Methods: The study group consisted of 500 patients undergoing corrective surgery for idiopathic scoliosis between 1987 and 1997. All patients were monitored using somatosensory-evoked and neurogenic motor-evoked potential techniques, using a standard protocol developed at this institution.

Results: The false-positive rate (significant data change without postoperative neurologic deficit) was 0.014% (n = 7). The true-positive rate (degradation of data that met warning criteria, with a corresponding postoperative neurologic deficit) was 0.004% (n = 2). No false-negative results (normal data during with a postoperative neurologic deficit) were seen. The sensitivity of combined somatosensory-evoked and neurogenic motor-evoked potential data in predicting neurologic status was 98.6%, and the specificity of normal data predicting normal findings in a neurologic examination was 100%.

Conclusion: Combined somatosensory-evoked and neurogenic motor-evoked potentials monitoring during idiopathic scoliosis surgery represents a standard of care that obviates the need for an intraoperative wake-up test when reliable data are obtained and maintained.

Citing Articles

Accuracy of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring in the Diagnosis of Intraoperative Neurological Decline in the Setting of Spinal Surgery-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Alvi M, Kwon B, Hejrati N, Tetreault L, Evaniew N, Skelly A Global Spine J. 2024; 14(3_suppl):105S-149S.

PMID: 38632716 PMC: 10964897. DOI: 10.1177/21925682231196514.


Comparison of Motor Evoked Potentials Neuromonitoring Following Pre- and Postoperative Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Intraoperative Electrical Stimulation in Patients Undergoing Surgical Correction of Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Daroszewski P, Huber J, Kaczmarek K, Janusz P, Glowka P, Tomaszewski M J Clin Med. 2023; 12(19).

PMID: 37834956 PMC: 10573895. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12196312.


The adjunct use of descending neurogenic-evoked potentials when transcranial motor-evoked potentials degrade into warning criteria in pediatric spinal deformity surgery: minimizing false-positive events.

Troyer S, Ribaudo J, Raynor B, Zertan C, Kelly B, Kelly M Spine Deform. 2023; 11(6):1427-1433.

PMID: 37535306 DOI: 10.1007/s43390-023-00743-5.


Surgical Causes of Significant Intraoperative Neuromonitoring Signal Changes in Three-Column Spinal Surgery.

Wi S, Park S, Chang S, Lee J, Kim S, Chang B Asian Spine J. 2021; 15(6):831-839.

PMID: 34915606 PMC: 8696058. DOI: 10.31616/asj.2021.0078.


Indication and technical implementation of the intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during spine surgeries-a transnational survey in the German-speaking countries.

Siller S, Raith C, Zausinger S, Tonn J, Szelenyi A Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2019; 161(9):1865-1875.

PMID: 31227966 DOI: 10.1007/s00701-019-03974-6.