» Articles » PMID: 17619913

Current Approach on Spinal Cord Monitoring: the Point of View of the Neurologist, the Anesthesiologist and the Spine Surgeon

Overview
Journal Eur Spine J
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2007 Jul 11
PMID 17619913
Citations 43
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Optimal outcome in spine surgery is dependent of the coordination of efforts by the surgeon, anesthesiologist, and neurophysiologist. This is perhaps best illustrated by the rising use of intraoperative spinal cord monitoring for complex spine surgery. The challenges presented by neurophysiologic monitoring, in particular the use of somatosensory and motor evoked potentials, requires an understanding by each member for the team of the proposed operative procedure as well as an ability to help differentiate clinically important signal changes from false positive changes. Surgical, anesthetic, and monitoring issues need to be addressed when relying on this form of monitoring to reduce the potential of negative outcomes in spine surgery. This article provides a practical overview from the perspective of the neurophysiologist, the anesthesiologist, and the surgeon on the requirements which must be understood by these participants in order to successfully contribute to a positive outcome when a patient is undergoing complex spine surgery.

Citing Articles

Can tongue laceration caused by intraoperative neuromonitoring during spinal surgery in the prone position be prevented?: Assessment of a new management protocol which includes placement of a silicone dental guard.

Meco B, Aytug S, Baskan E, Meco C Eur J Anaesthesiol Intensive Care. 2025; 2(5):e0033.

PMID: 39916812 PMC: 11783605. DOI: 10.1097/EA9.0000000000000033.


Intraoperative somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) monitoring: an updated position statement by the American Society of Neurophysiological Monitoring.

Richard Toleikis J, Pace C, R Jahangiri F, B Hemmer L, C Toleikis S J Clin Monit Comput. 2024; 38(5):1003-1042.

PMID: 39068294 PMC: 11427520. DOI: 10.1007/s10877-024-01201-x.


Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring in Neurosurgery.

Guzzi G, Ricciuti R, Della Torre A, Lo Turco E, Lavano A, Longhini F J Clin Med. 2024; 13(10).

PMID: 38792507 PMC: 11122101. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13102966.


Updated review on the use of neuromuscular blockade during intraoperative motor-evoked potential monitoring in the modern anesthesia era.

Phoowanakulchai S, Kawaguchi M J Anesth. 2023; 38(1):114-124.

PMID: 37843561 DOI: 10.1007/s00540-023-03265-6.


Intraoperative Dental Injury in a Neurosurgical Patient: Concerns for the Anesthesiologist.

Bhamri S, Dey S, Gupta M, Bindu B, Arora M Cureus. 2022; 14(11):e31268.

PMID: 36505164 PMC: 9731933. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.31268.


References
1.
Pelosi L, Jardine A, Webb J . Neurological complications of anterior spinal surgery for kyphosis with normal somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs). J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1999; 66(5):662-4. PMC: 1736350. DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.66.5.662. View

2.
Schubert A, Licina M, Glaze G, Paranandi L . Systemic lidocaine and human somatosensory-evoked potentials during sufentanil-isoflurane anaesthesia. Can J Anaesth. 1992; 39(6):569-75. DOI: 10.1007/BF03008320. View

3.
Nuwer M . Spinal cord monitoring. Muscle Nerve. 1999; 22(12):1620-30. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4598(199912)22:12<1620::aid-mus2>3.0.co;2-1. View

4.
King S, Davis F, Wells J, Murchison D, Pryor P . Lidocaine for the prevention of pain due to injection of propofol. Anesth Analg. 1992; 74(2):246-9. DOI: 10.1213/00000539-199202000-00013. View

5.
Kawaguchi M, Sakamoto T, Inoue S, Kakimoto M, Furuya H, Morimoto T . Low dose propofol as a supplement to ketamine-based anesthesia during intraoperative monitoring of motor-evoked potentials. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000; 25(8):974-9. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200004150-00013. View