Objective(s):
To correlate fertilization and clinical pregnancy rates (PRs) in low responders with their E2 levels (<500, 500-800, >800-1,000 pg/mL), age (20-30, 31-40, >40 years), number of follicles, and number of oocytes retrieved.
Design:
A retrospective study.
Setting:
The IVF unit of an academic hospital.
Patient(s):
One hundred forty-three women who failed to attain E2 levels of 1,000 pg/mL on the day of hCG administration.
Intervention(s):
Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation, blood E2 and progesterone measurements, ultrasonographic scanning of ovarian follicles, oocyte retrieval after hCG administration, and ET.
Main Outcome Measure:
Clinical PR.
Result(s):
Although E2 levels, fertilization rates, age, and number of oocytes did not differ significantly between the three age groups, the PR achieved in the youngest group was approximately three times as high (19.3%) as that achieved in the two older groups.
Conclusion:
Young low responders represent a unique subset in that their age protects them from the deleterious effects of poor ovarian response.
Citing Articles
The effects of intraovarian injection of autologous menstrual blood-derived mesenchymal stromal cells on pregnancy outcomes in women with poor ovarian response.
Zafardoust S, Kazemnejad S, Fathi-Kazerooni M, Darzi M, Sadeghi M, Sadeghi Tabar A
Stem Cell Res Ther. 2023; 14(1):332.
PMID: 37968668
PMC: 10647057.
DOI: 10.1186/s13287-023-03568-1.
Predicting IVF outcome in poor ovarian responders.
Lebovitz O, Haas J, Mor N, Zilberberg E, Aizer A, Kirshenbaum M
BMC Womens Health. 2022; 22(1):395.
PMID: 36180882
PMC: 9524122.
DOI: 10.1186/s12905-022-01964-y.
Decision regret and associated factors following oocyte cryopreservation in patients with diminished ovarian reserve and/or age-related fertility decline.
Gurbuz A, Cil A, Karakis L, Abali R, Ceyhan M, Aksakal E
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021; 38(6):1469-1479.
PMID: 33797008
PMC: 8266947.
DOI: 10.1007/s10815-021-02164-7.
The clinical outcomes of fresh versus frozen embryos transfer in women ≥40 years with poor ovarian response.
Liu C, Li Y, Jiang H, Liu Y, Song X
Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2021; 64(3):284-292.
PMID: 33517605
PMC: 8138078.
DOI: 10.5468/ogs.20124.
The Predictive Value of the Follicular Output Rate on Pregnancy Outcome of Patients with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Undergoing In Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer.
Yang H, Lin J, Jin C, Meng L, Wu S, Chen Y
Med Sci Monit. 2020; 26:e916175.
PMID: 33306667
PMC: 7737407.
DOI: 10.12659/MSM.916175.
Poor ovarian reserve.
Jirge P
J Hum Reprod Sci. 2016; 9(2):63-9.
PMID: 27382229
PMC: 4915288.
DOI: 10.4103/0974-1208.183514.
Predictors of treatment failure in young patients undergoing in vitro fertilization.
Jacobs M, Klonoff-Cohen H, Agarwal S, Kritz-Silverstein D, Lindsay S, Garzo V
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016; 33(8):1001-7.
PMID: 27154866
PMC: 4974223.
DOI: 10.1007/s10815-016-0725-1.
Evaluation of serum anti-Mullerian hormone as a biomarker of early ovarian aging in young women undergoing IVF/ICSI cycle.
Lin P, Huang F, Kung F, Chiang H, Lin Y, Lin Y
Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2014; 7(9):6245-53.
PMID: 25337276
PMC: 4203247.
Role of perifollicular Doppler blood flow in predicting cycle response in infertile women with genital tuberculosis undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection.
Malhotra N, Bahadur A, Singh N, Kalaivani M, Mittal S
J Hum Reprod Sci. 2014; 7(1):19-24.
PMID: 24829526
PMC: 4018792.
DOI: 10.4103/0974-1208.130809.
The Concepts and Consequences of Early Ovarian Ageing: A Caveat to Women's Health.
Subrat P, Santa S, Vandana J
J Reprod Infertil. 2013; 14(1):3-7.
PMID: 23926554
PMC: 3719358.
Cumulative live birth rate after three ovarian stimulation IVF cycles for poor ovarian responders according to the bologna criteria.
Ke H, Chen X, Liu Y, Ye D, He Y, Chen S
J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci. 2013; 33(3):418-422.
PMID: 23771670
DOI: 10.1007/s11596-013-1134-7.
Less is more: increased gonadotropin use for ovarian stimulation adversely influences clinical pregnancy and live birth after in vitro fertilization.
Pal L, Jindal S, Witt B, Santoro N
Fertil Steril. 2008; 89(6):1694-701.
PMID: 18440515
PMC: 2601677.
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.05.055.
Evaluation and treatment of low responders in assisted reproductive technology: a challenge to meet.
Fasouliotis S, Simon A, Laufer N
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2000; 17(7):357-73.
PMID: 11077616
PMC: 3489420.
DOI: 10.1023/a:1009465324197.