» Articles » PMID: 36180882

Predicting IVF Outcome in Poor Ovarian Responders

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2022 Sep 30
PMID 36180882
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Poor responders to ovarian stimulation are one of the most challenging populations to treat. As a failed cycle can cause a considerable emotional and economical loss, adequate fertility counseling addressing patients' expectations are highly important when facing patients with poor ovarian response. The study aimed to evaluate reproductive outcomes and to identify factors associated with live birth (LB) after fresh autologous IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles of patients fulfilling the Bologna criteria for poor ovarian response (POR).

Methods: A retrospective study included 751 IVF/ICSI treatment cycles which yielded up to three retrieved oocytes, at a tertiary referral hospital between January 2016 and February 2020. A logistic regression analysis was used to adjust for confounders.

Results: Clinical pregnancy and LB rate per cycle were significantly higher among women younger versus older than 40 years (9.8% and 6.8% vs 4.5% and 2.1%, p < 0.01, respectively). Patients who achieved LB were significantly younger, had higher number of oocytes retrieved, fertilization rate and top-quality embryos (p < 0.05). Multivariable regression analysis identified patient's age (OR 0.90; 95% CI 0.845-0.97; p = 0.005) and mean number retrieved oocytes (OR 1.95; 95% CI 1.20-3.16; p = 0.007) as factors significantly associated with the probability of a LB.

Conclusions: The woman's age and the number of retrieved oocytes are both independent predicting factors of live birth in poor ovarian responders. Considering the risks, the high financial investment and poor reproductive outcomes involved in IVF treatments, raises questions regarding the adequacy of providing treatments in these patients' population. POR younger than 40 years may represent a possible exception due to acceptable probability for a LB.

Citing Articles

Evaluating the association of female obesity with the risk of live birth following IVF: Implications for clinical practice.

Schneider E, Hamer O, Smith C, Hill J Pract Midwife. 2024; 27:20240101.

PMID: 39045260 PMC: 7616286. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmz011.


Harnessing Artificial Intelligence to Predict Ovarian Stimulation Outcomes in In Vitro Fertilization: Scoping Review.

AlSaad R, Abd-Alrazaq A, Choucair F, Ahmed A, Aziz S, Sheikh J J Med Internet Res. 2024; 26:e53396.

PMID: 38967964 PMC: 11259766. DOI: 10.2196/53396.


Nomogram to predict the probability of clinical pregnancy in women with poor ovarian response undergoing in vitro fertilization/ intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles.

Zhu S, Jiang W, Sun Y, Chen L, Li R, Chen X Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024; 310(3):1697-1707.

PMID: 38913207 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-024-07598-9.


P62 promotes FSH-induced antral follicle formation by directing degradation of ubiquitinated WT1.

Zhao T, He M, Zhu Z, Zhang T, Zheng W, Qin S Cell Mol Life Sci. 2024; 81(1):221.

PMID: 38763964 PMC: 11102895. DOI: 10.1007/s00018-024-05251-x.


Construction of the machine learning-based live birth prediction models for the first in vitro fertilization pregnant women.

Liu X, Chen Z, Ji Y BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023; 23(1):476.

PMID: 37370040 PMC: 10294395. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-023-05775-3.

References
1.
de Bruin J, Dorland M, Spek E, Posthuma G, van Haaften M, Looman C . Age-related changes in the ultrastructure of the resting follicle pool in human ovaries. Biol Reprod. 2003; 70(2):419-24. DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.103.015784. View

2.
Ferraretti A, La Marca A, Fauser B, Tarlatzis B, Nargund G, Gianaroli L . ESHRE consensus on the definition of 'poor response' to ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: the Bologna criteria. Hum Reprod. 2011; 26(7):1616-24. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/der092. View

3.
Alviggi C, Conforti A, Caprio F, Gizzo S, Noventa M, Strina I . In Estimated Good Prognosis Patients Could Unexpected "Hyporesponse" to Controlled Ovarian Stimulation be Related to Genetic Polymorphisms of FSH Receptor?. Reprod Sci. 2016; 23(8):1103-8. DOI: 10.1177/1933719116630419. View

4.
Polyzos N, Nwoye M, Corona R, Blockeel C, Stoop D, Haentjens P . Live birth rates in Bologna poor responders treated with ovarian stimulation for IVF/ICSI. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014; 28(4):469-74. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.11.010. View

5.
Simon A, Holzer H, Hurwitz A, Revel A, Zentner B, Lossos F . Comparison of cryopreservation outcome following intracytoplasmic sperm injection and conventional in vitro fertilization. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1998; 15(7):431-7. PMC: 3454802. DOI: 10.1007/BF02744937. View