» Articles » PMID: 9626693

Comparison of Mean Skin Temperature Using 'covered' Versus 'uncovered' Contact Thermistors

Overview
Journal Physiol Meas
Date 1998 Jun 17
PMID 9626693
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the mean skin temperature (Tsk) obtained using 'covered' versus 'uncovered' contact thermistors in a variety of environmental conditions. Ten male subjects walked on a treadmill at 6.4 kph for 30 min in three different environments: thermoneutral (23 degrees C/50% RH), hot-humid (35 degrees C/80%), and hot-dry (42 degrees C/20%). Tsk was measured using three 'uncovered' contact thermistors, and three 'covered' thermistors. The 'uncovered' probes were attached using acrylic rings that allowed the outer surface of the thermistors to have free exchange with the environment. The 'covered' probes were affixed to the skin using foam patches and tape. The latter procedure is commonly used in many research and clinical laboratories. The 'covered' probes resulted in a significantly (p < 0.05) higher Tsk under all three environmental conditions. The largest difference occurred in the thermoneutral condition with the 'covered' Tsk being 1.3 degrees C higher than the 'uncovered' Tsk. These results suggest that covering a contact skin thermistor hinders heat loss and results in an artificially high Tsk. It is hoped that the results of this study will encourage the adoption of 'uncovered' contact skin thermistors in the future.

Citing Articles

Strategies in surface engineering for the regulation of microclimates in skin-medical product interactions.

Reuvekamp H, Hekman E, van der Heide E, Matthews D Heliyon. 2024; 10(4):e25395.

PMID: 38370189 PMC: 10869805. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25395.


A century of exercise physiology: concepts that ignited the study of human thermoregulation. Part 2: physiological measurements.

Notley S, Mitchell D, Taylor N Eur J Appl Physiol. 2023; 123(12):2587-2685.

PMID: 37796291 DOI: 10.1007/s00421-023-05284-3.


Thermoregulatory responses during road races in hot-humid conditions at the 2019 Athletics World Championships.

Aylwin P, Havenith G, Cardinale M, Lloyd A, Ihsan M, Taylor L J Appl Physiol (1985). 2023; 134(5):1300-1311.

PMID: 37022963 PMC: 10190834. DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00348.2022.


A Thermal Skin Model for Comparing Contact Skin Temperature Sensors and Assessing Measurement Errors.

MacRae B, Spengler C, Psikuta A, Rossi R, Annaheim S Sensors (Basel). 2021; 21(14).

PMID: 34300649 PMC: 8309895. DOI: 10.3390/s21144906.


Comparison of two skin temperature assessment methods after the application of topical revulsive products: Conductive iButton data logger system vs contact-free infrared thermometry.

Stoop R, Hohenauer E, Aerenhouts D, Barel A, Deliens T, Clijsen R Skin Res Technol. 2020; 26(5):648-653.

PMID: 32274890 PMC: 7586984. DOI: 10.1111/srt.12847.