» Articles » PMID: 9609622

Comparison of Radical Prostatectomy and Iodine 125 Interstitial Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: a 7-year Biochemical (PSA) Progression Analysis

Overview
Journal Urology
Specialty Urology
Date 1998 Jun 3
PMID 9609622
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the relative efficacy of brachytherapy to radical prostatectomy, we compared biochemical progression rates from a published series of men who underwent iodine 125 (125I) interstitial radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer to a similar group of men who underwent anatomic radical prostatectomy using appropriate end points.

Methods: Seventy-six men who underwent anatomic radical prostatectomy between 1988 and 1990 were carefully matched for Gleason score and clinical stage to a recently reported contemporary series of patients treated at another institution with 125I brachytherapy without adjuvant treatment. The definition of biochemical progression was a serum PSA level greater than 0.2 ng/mL after anatomic radical prostatectomy and greater than 0.5 ng/mL for brachytherapy-treated patients.

Results: The 7-year actuarial PSA progression-free survival following anatomic radical prostatectomy was 97.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 85.6% to 99.7%) for this group of men selected to match the brachytherapy group, compared to 79% (95% CI not published) for men treated with 125I interstitial radiotherapy.

Conclusions: Using comparative end points for biochemical-free progression, failure rates may be higher following 125I interstitial radiotherapy compared to anatomic radical prostatectomy. These data provide a better comparison of biochemical progression than previously published studies and emphasize the need for caution in interpreting the relative efficacy of brachytherapy in controlling localized prostate cancer.

Citing Articles

Long-term oncologic outcomes of radiotherapy combined with maximal androgen blockade for localized, high-risk prostate cancer.

Luo Y, Li M, Qi H, Zhao J, Han Y, Lin Y World J Surg Oncol. 2018; 16(1):107.

PMID: 29890979 PMC: 5996541. DOI: 10.1186/s12957-018-1395-5.


Meta-analysis of studies comparing oncologic outcomes of radical prostatectomy and brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer.

Cozzi G, Musi G, Bianchi R, Bottero D, Brescia A, Cioffi A Ther Adv Urol. 2018; 9(11):241-250.

PMID: 29662542 PMC: 5896855. DOI: 10.1177/1756287217731449.


Comparative analysis of short - term functional outcomes and quality of life in a prospective series of brachytherapy and Da Vinci robotic prostatectomy.

Garcia-Sanchez C, Martin A, Conde-Sanchez J, Congregado-Ruiz C, Osman-Garcia I, Medina-Lopez R Int Braz J Urol. 2017; 43(2):216-223.

PMID: 28128908 PMC: 5433359. DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2016.0098.


Low-dose-rate or high-dose-rate brachytherapy in treatment of prostate cancer - between options.

Skowronek J J Contemp Brachytherapy. 2013; 5(1):33-41.

PMID: 23634153 PMC: 3635047. DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2013.34342.


Comparison of two treatment approaches for prostate cancer: intensity-modulated radiation therapy combined with 125I seed-implant brachytherapy or 125I seed-implant brachytherapy alone.

Song Y, Chan M, Burman C, Cann D J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2008; 9(2):1-14.

PMID: 18714275 PMC: 5721712. DOI: 10.1120/jacmp.v9i2.2283.