» Articles » PMID: 12667421

The Current and Potential Role of Cryoablation As a Primary Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer

Overview
Journal Curr Oncol Rep
Publisher Current Science
Specialty Oncology
Date 2003 Apr 2
PMID 12667421
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Targeted cryoablation of the prostate has evolved significantly since its reintroduction in the early 1990s. This evolution stems from engineering advancements, procedural refinement, introduction of temperature monitoring, and greater understanding of cryobiology. Recent publications demonstrate durable efficacy for cryoablation, equivalent to other therapies for low-risk disease and possibly superior for moderate- and high-risk prostate cancer. Morbidity following the procedure is mild in comparison with other therapies, with the exception of sexual function impairment. However, longer-term quality-of-life studies show that a significant number of patients return to having intercourse, and late-onset morbidities are not observed. These results contrast with those for radiotherapy--specifically brachytherapy--for which several recent studies document a decline in sexual function, protracted morbidity, and the emergence of late-onset morbidity. Cryoablation is an effective therapy with acceptable morbidity that should be offered as a treatment option to all patients with localized prostate cancer. Furthermore, cryoablation has the potential ability to be tailored to an individual patient's disease. As diagnostic tools and methods continue to advance, it may become possible to target the less aggressive forms of prostate cancer. Focal cryoablation may prove to be an ideal treatment modality in this setting.

Citing Articles

Successful Use of Absorbable Hydrogel Rectal Spacers (SpaceOAR) Before Salvage Radiation Therapy After Previous Prostate Cryotherapy.

Applewhite J, Barker Jr J, Vestal J Adv Radiat Oncol. 2021; 6(3):100647.

PMID: 33748548 PMC: 7966841. DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2021.100647.


[Cryoablation of prostate cancer].

Witzsch U, Becht E Urologe A. 2015; 54(2):191-201.

PMID: 25659982 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-014-3667-1.


High dose rate prostate brachytherapy: an overview of the rationale, experience and emerging applications in the treatment of prostate cancer.

Challapalli A, Jones E, Harvey C, Hellawell G, Mangar S Br J Radiol. 2012; 85 Spec No 1:S18-27.

PMID: 23118099 PMC: 3746400. DOI: 10.1259/bjr/15403217.


When 'dueling technologies' are mistaken for progress.

Logothetis C BJU Int. 2011; 107(11):1699-700.

PMID: 21592278 PMC: 3922611. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10243.x.


Cryosurgery as primary treatment for localized prostate cancer.

Lian H, Guo H, Gan W, Li X, Yan X, Wang W Int Urol Nephrol. 2011; 43(4):1089-94.

PMID: 21475948 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-011-9952-7.


References
1.
McCammon K, Kolm P, Main B, Schellhammer P . Comparative quality-of-life analysis after radical prostatectomy or external beam radiation for localized prostate cancer. Urology. 1999; 54(3):509-16. DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(99)00163-6. View

2.
Catalona W, Basler J . Return of erections and urinary continence following nerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol. 1993; 150(3):905-7. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)35645-8. View

3.
Walsh P, DONKER P . Impotence following radical prostatectomy: insight into etiology and prevention. J Urol. 1982; 128(3):492-7. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)53012-8. View

4.
Zelefsky M, Leibel S, Gaudin P, Kutcher G, Fleshner N, Venkatramen E . Dose escalation with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy affects the outcome in prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998; 41(3):491-500. DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(98)00091-1. View

5.
Talcott J, Rieker P, Clark J, Propert K, Weeks J, Beard C . Patient-reported symptoms after primary therapy for early prostate cancer: results of a prospective cohort study. J Clin Oncol. 1998; 16(1):275-83. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.1.275. View