» Articles » PMID: 9596057

Revision Rates After Knee Replacement in the United States

Overview
Journal Med Care
Specialty Health Services
Date 1998 May 22
PMID 9596057
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Each year approximately 100,000 Medicare patients undergo knee replacement surgery. Patients, referring physicians, and surgeons must consider a variety of factors when deciding if knee replacement is indicated. One factor in this decision process is the likelihood of revision knee replacement after the initial surgery. This study determined the chance that a revision knee replacement will occur and which factors were associated with revision.

Methods: Data on all primary and revision knee replacements that were performed on Medicare patients during the years 1985 through 1990 were obtained. The probability that a revision knee replacement occurred was modeled from data for all patients for whom 2 full years of follow-up data were available. Two strategies for linking revisions to a particular primary knee replacement for each patient were developed. Predictive models were developed for each linking strategy. ICD-9-CM codes were used to determine hospitalizations for primary knee replacement and revision knee replacement.

Results: More than 200,000 hospitalizations for primary knee replacements were performed, with fewer than 3% of them requiring revision within 2 years. The following factors increase the chance of revision within 2 years of primary knee replacement: (1) male gender, (2) younger age, (3) longer length of hospital stay for the primary knee replacement, (4) more diagnoses at the primary knee replacement hospitalization, (5) unspecified arthritis type, (6) surgical complications during the primary knee replacement hospitalization, and (7) primary knee replacement performed at an urban hospital.

Conclusions: Revision knee replacement is uncommon. Demographic, clinical, and process factors were related to the probability of revision knee replacement.

Citing Articles

Does interaction occur between risk factors for revision total knee arthroplasty?.

Bounajem G, DeClercq J, Collett G, Ayers G, Jain N Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023; 144(12):5061-5070.

PMID: 37902892 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-023-05107-2.


Comparison of readmission and early revision rates as a quality metric in total knee arthroplasty using the Nationwide Readmission Database.

Urish K, Qin Y, Salka B, Li B, Borza T, Sessine M Ann Transl Med. 2020; 8(11):687.

PMID: 32617307 PMC: 7327322. DOI: 10.21037/atm-19-3463.


Improved outcomes in patients with positive metal sensitivity following revision total knee arthroplasty.

Zondervan R, Vaux J, Blackmer M, Brazier B, Taunt Jr C J Orthop Surg Res. 2019; 14(1):182.

PMID: 31208448 PMC: 6580588. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-019-1228-4.


Pre-operative prediction of soft tissue balancing in knee arthoplasty part 1: Effect of surgical parameters during level walking.

Viceconti M, Ascani D, Mazza C J Orthop Res. 2019; 37(7):1537-1545.

PMID: 30908694 PMC: 6617758. DOI: 10.1002/jor.24289.


Effects of pay for performance on risk incidence of infection and of revision after total knee arthroplasty in type 2 diabetic patients: A nationwide matched cohort study.

Tsai Y, Kung P, Ku M, Wang Y, Tsai W PLoS One. 2018; 13(11):e0206797.

PMID: 30388167 PMC: 6214551. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206797.