» Articles » PMID: 19057730

Patient Characteristics Affecting the Prognosis of Total Hip and Knee Joint Arthroplasty: a Systematic Review

Overview
Journal Can J Surg
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2008 Dec 6
PMID 19057730
Citations 211
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Total joint arthroplasty is a highly efficacious and cost-effective procedure for moderate to severe arthritis in the hip and knee. Although patient characteristics are considered to be important determinants of who receives total joint arthroplasty, no systematic review has addressed how they affect the outcomes of total joint arthroplasty. This study addresses how patient characteristics influence the outcomes of hip and knee arthroplasty in patients with osteoarthritis.

Methods: We searched 4 bibliographic databases (MEDLINE 1980-2001, CINAHL 1982-2001, EMBASE 1980-2001, HealthStar 1998-1999) for studies involving more than 500 patients with osteoarthritis and 1 or more of the following outcomes after total joint arthroplasty: pain, physical function, postoperative complications (short-and long-term) and time to revision. Prognostic patient characteristics of interest included age, sex, race, body weight, socioeconomic status and work status.

Results: Sixty-four of 14,276 studies were eligible for inclusion and had extractable data. Younger age (variably defined) and male sex increased the risk of revision 3-fold to 5-fold for hip and knee arthroplasty. The influence of weight on the risk of revision was contradictory. Mortality was greatest in the oldest age group and among men. Function for older patients was worse after hip arthroplasty (particularly in women). Function after knee arthroplasty was worse for obese patients.

Conclusion: Although further research is required, our findings suggest that, after total joint arthroplasty, younger age and male sex are associated with increased risk of revision, older age and male sex are associated with increased risk of mortality, older age is related to worse function (particularly among women), and age and sex do not influence the outcome of pain. Despite these findings, all subgroups derived benefit from total joint arthroplasty, suggesting that surgeons should not restrict access to these procedures based on patient characteristics. In addition, future research needs to provide standardized measures of outcomes.

Citing Articles

Genicular Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation for Chronic Knee Joint Pain Using a V-Shaped Active Tip Needle: A Single-Center Retrospective Observational Study.

Lo Bianco G, Pugliesi M, Misseri G, Li S, Day M, Schatman M J Pain Res. 2025; 18:1045-1055.

PMID: 40052158 PMC: 11882468. DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S502453.


Postoperative Rehabilitation Interventions in Patients at Risk of Poorer Outcomes Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.

Karimijashni M, Yoo S, Barnes K, Lessard-Dostie H, Dabbagh A, Ramsay T Musculoskeletal Care. 2025; 23(1):e70054.

PMID: 39853665 PMC: 11757015. DOI: 10.1002/msc.70054.


Comparing effectiveness of 3-needle approach versus 5-needle approach of genicular nerve block on pain and quality of life in chronic osteoarthritis of knee: a double blinded randomised controlled trial.

Bhargava M, Gaur R, Gonnade N, Sarankumar G, Elhence A, Gahlot N BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024; 25(1):978.

PMID: 39614201 PMC: 11606273. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-07938-5.


Incidence and timing of postoperative complications after total hip and knee arthroplasty.

Diaz-Dilernia F, Steinfeld Y, Pincus D, Spangehl M, Ravi B Can J Surg. 2024; 67(6):E377-E382.

PMID: 39592196 PMC: 11602197. DOI: 10.1503/cjs.004724.


Impact of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia on Postoperative Complications and Periprosthetic Joint Infections After Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Esmaeili S, Razaghi H, Malekshahi M, Soleimani M, Shafiei S, Golbakhsh M Arthroplast Today. 2024; 30:101552.

PMID: 39559544 PMC: 11570822. DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2024.101552.


References
1.
Skeie S, Lende S, Sjoberg E, Vollset S . Survival of the Charnley hip in coxarthrosis. A 10-15-year follow-up of 629 cases. Acta Orthop Scand. 1991; 62(2):98-101. DOI: 10.3109/17453679108999231. View

2.
Morrey B, Ilstrup D . Size of the femoral head and acetabular revision in total hip-replacement arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989; 71(1):50-5. View

3.
Hawker G, Wright J, Coyte P, Paul J, Dittus R, Croxford R . Health-related quality of life after knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998; 80(2):163-73. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199802000-00003. View

4.
Johnsson R, Thorngren K, Persson B . Revision of total hip replacement for primary osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1988; 70(1):56-62. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.70B1.3339062. View

5.
Harris W, Sledge C . Total hip and total knee replacement (2). N Engl J Med. 1990; 323(12):801-7. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199009203231206. View