» Articles » PMID: 9588466

Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Assessment of Long-term Outcome 12 Years After Operative and Conservative Treatment

Overview
Journal J Spinal Disord
Date 1998 May 20
PMID 9588466
Citations 24
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The present study focuses on the long-term prognosis of radiographically verified stenosis of the lower lumbar spine. The purpose here was to describe the outcome 12 years after radiographic diagnosis of spinal stenosis and to identify factors predicting disability after operative or conservative treatment. Data were compiled on 75 patients (43 men and 32 women) with changes in functional myelography diagnostic for spinal stenosis. Their mean age at the interview 12 years later was 61 years. The sagittal diameter of the dural sac was measured from baseline myelographs at all intervertebral levels and was corrected for magnification. In the interview, subjective outcome assessment was obtained with a structured questionnaire, and the low-back disorder was scored using the Oswestry disability index. The sagittal diameter of the dural sac was severely stenotic (<7.0 mm) in 32 patients (26 operated), and moderately stenotic (7.0-10.5 mm) in 43 patients (31 operated). The severity of the stenosis significantly predicted disability, even when the effects of age, sex, therapy regimen, and body mass index were adjusted for. For moderate and severe stenosis, the adjusted mean Oswestry indices were 28.4 and 39.1, respectively (p = 0.01). Therapy as such (operative versus nonoperative) did not significantly correlate with later disability. The radiographic severity of lumbar spinal stenosis predicts disability independently of therapy regimen. Randomized clinical trials are needed to establish the indications for surgical and conservative treatment. Radiographic severity of the stenosis should be considered as an effect-modifying or confounding factor in clinical trials and other studies focusing on the outcome of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Citing Articles

Lumbar Spinal Rahisynthesis with Plif: a Retrospective Study of 58 Patients Demonstrating Imaging and Clinical Outcomes with One Year Follow-up.

Zygogiannis K, Chatzikomninos I, Moschos S, Palavos I, Thivaios G, Kalampokis A Maedica (Bucur). 2024; 19(3):502-510.

PMID: 39553352 PMC: 11565143. DOI: 10.26574/maedica.2024.19.3.502.


Time Course of Asymptomatic Stenosis in Multiple Lumbar Spinal Stenosis-Five-Year Results of Selective Decompression of Symptomatic Levels.

Watanabe K, Otani K, Nikaido T, Kato K, Kobayashi H, Yabuki S Medicina (Kaunas). 2024; 60(4).

PMID: 38674282 PMC: 11052377. DOI: 10.3390/medicina60040636.


Quality of life in lumbar spinal stenosis: Does it correlate with magnetic resonance imaging and spinopelvic parameters?.

Beyer F, Prasse T, Eysel P, Bredow J J Orthop. 2023; 47:67-71.

PMID: 38022842 PMC: 10679525. DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2023.11.010.


Does lumbar MRI predict degree of disability in patients with degenerative disc disease? A prospective cross-sectional study at University of Gondar comprehensive specialized hospital, North West Ethiopia, 2020.

Gebrewold Y, Tesfaye B BMC Med Imaging. 2022; 22(1):138.

PMID: 35931973 PMC: 9354276. DOI: 10.1186/s12880-022-00866-7.


The 100 Most Cited Articles on Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Bibliometric Analysis.

Yin M, Xu C, Mo W Global Spine J. 2020; 12(3):381-391.

PMID: 32856488 PMC: 9121157. DOI: 10.1177/2192568220952074.