Variation in Outcomes Across Centers After Surgery for Lumbar Stenosis and Degenerative Spondylolisthesis in the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial

Overview

Journal Spine (Phila Pa 1976)

Specialty Orthopedics

Date 2012 Oct 20

PMID 23080425

Citations 13

Authors

Atman Desai

Kimon Bekelis

Perry A Ball

Jon Lurie

Sohail K Mirza

Tor D Tosteson

Wenyan Zhao

James N Weinstein

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Study Design: Retrospective review of a prospectively collected database.

Objective: To examine whether short- and long-term outcomes after surgery for lumbar stenosis (SPS) and degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS) vary across centers.

Summary Of Background Data: Surgery has been shown to be of benefit for both SPS and DS. For both conditions, surgery often consists of laminectomy with or without fusion. Potential differences in outcomes of these overlapping procedures across various surgical centers have not yet been investigated.

Methods: Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial cohort participants with a confirmed diagnosis of SPS or DS undergoing surgery were followed from baseline at 6 weeks, 3, 6, and 12 months, and yearly thereafter, at 13 spine clinics in 11 US states. Baseline characteristics and short- and long-term outcomes were analyzed.

Results: A total of 793 patients underwent surgery. Significant differences were found between centers with regard to patient race, body mass index, treatment preference, neurological deficit, stenosis location, severity, and number of stenotic levels. Significant differences were also found in operative duration and blood loss, the incidence of durotomy, the length of hospital stay, and wound infection. When baseline differences were adjusted for, significant differences were still seen between centers in changes in patient functional outcome (Short Form-36 bodily pain and physical function, and Oswestry Disability Index) at 1 year after surgery. In addition, the cumulative adjusted change in the Oswestry Disability Index Score at 4 years significantly differed among centers, with Short Form-36 scores trending toward significance.

Conclusion: There is a broad and statistically significant variation in short- and long-term outcomes after surgery for SPS and DS across various academic centers, when statistically significant baseline differences are adjusted for. The findings suggest that the choice of center affects outcome after these procedures, although further studies are required to investigate which center characteristics are most important.

Citing Articles

Variations in surgical practice and short-term outcomes for degenerative lumbar scoliosis and spondylolisthesis: do surgeon training and experience matter?.

Shetty K, Chen P, Brara H, Anand N, Skaggs D, Calsavara V Int J Qual Health Care. 2023; 36(1).

PMID: 38156345 PMC: 10849168. DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzad109.

Effect of Mixture of Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenic Protein-2 and Demineralized Bone Matrix in Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Son J, Lee Y, Ko M, Wui S, Park S J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2023; 67(3):354-363.

PMID: 37850225 PMC: 11079555. DOI: 10.3340/jkns.2023.0136.

Different Approaches for Case-Mix Adjustment of Patient-Reported Outcomes to Compare Healthcare Providers-Methodological Results of a Systematic Review.

Sibert N, Pfaff H, Breidenbach C, Wesselmann S, Kowalski C Cancers (Basel). 2021; 13(16).

PMID: 34439117 PMC: 8392243. DOI: 10.3390/cancers13163964.

Royuela A, Kovacs F, Seco-Calvo J, Fernandez-Felix B, Abraira V, Zamora J Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(8).

PMID: 33916951 PMC: 8067591. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18083855.

Analyzing the Correlation Between Surgeon Experience and Patient Length of Hospital Stay.

Rajpal S, Shah M, Vivek N, Burneikiene S Cureus. 2020; 12(8):e10099.

PMID: 33005520 PMC: 7522170. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.10099.

References

Chou R, Baisden J, Carragee E, Resnick D, Shaffer W, Loeser J . Surgery for low back pain: a review of the evidence for an American Pain Society Clinical Practice Guideline. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009; 34(10):1094-109. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a105fc. View

Deyo R, Weinstein J . Low back pain. N Engl J Med. 2001; 344(5):363-70. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM200102013440508. View

Goodney P, Stukel T, Lucas F, Finlayson E, Birkmeyer J . Hospital volume, length of stay, and readmission rates in high-risk surgery. Ann Surg. 2003; 238(2):161-7. PMC: 1422689. DOI: 10.1097/01.SLA.0000081094.66659.c3. View

Weinstein J, Lurie J, Tosteson T, Skinner J, Hanscom B, Tosteson A . Surgical vs nonoperative treatment for lumbar disk herniation: the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) observational cohort. JAMA. 2006; 296(20):2451-9. PMC: 2562254. DOI: 10.1001/jama.296.20.2451. View

Luft H, Bunker J, Enthoven A . Should operations be regionalized? The empirical relation between surgical volume and mortality. 1979. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007; 457:3-9. DOI: 10.1097/BLO.0b013e318034285e. View

Djurasovic M, Glassman S, Carreon L, Dimar 2nd J . Contemporary management of symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis. Orthop Clin North Am. 2010; 41(2):183-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.ocl.2009.12.003. View

Khuri S, Daley J, Henderson W, Hur K, Hossain M, Soybel D . Relation of surgical volume to outcome in eight common operations: results from the VA National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Ann Surg. 1999; 230(3):414-29; discussion 429-32. PMC: 1420886. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199909000-00014. View

Kizer K . The volume-outcome conundrum. N Engl J Med. 2003; 349(22):2159-61. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMe038166. View

Dewing C, Provencher M, Riffenburgh R, Kerr S, Manos R . The outcomes of lumbar microdiscectomy in a young, active population: correlation by herniation type and level. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008; 33(1):33-8. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815e3a42. View

10.

Birkmeyer J, Stukel T, Siewers A, Goodney P, Wennberg D, Lucas F . Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003; 349(22):2117-27. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa035205. View

11.

Begg C, Cramer L, Hoskins W, Brennan M . Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery. JAMA. 1998; 280(20):1747-51. DOI: 10.1001/jama.280.20.1747. View

12.

Taylor V, Deyo R, Cherkin D, Kreuter W . Low back pain hospitalization. Recent United States trends and regional variations. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994; 19(11):1207-12; discussion 13. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199405310-00002. View

13.

JAVID M, Hadar E . Long-term follow-up review of patients who underwent laminectomy for lumbar stenosis: a prospective study. J Neurosurg. 1998; 89(1):1-7. DOI: 10.3171/jns.1998.89.1.0001. View

14.

Hosenpud J, Breen T, Edwards E, Daily O, Hunsicker L . The effect of transplant center volume on cardiac transplant outcome. A report of the United Network for Organ Sharing Scientific Registry. JAMA. 1994; 271(23):1844-9. View

15.

Atlas S, Keller R, Wu Y, Deyo R, Singer D . Long-term outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis: 8 to 10 year results from the maine lumbar spine study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005; 30(8):936-43. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000158953.57966.c0. View

16.

Schurman S, Stablein D, Perlman S, Warady B . Center volume effects in pediatric renal transplantation. A report of the North American Pediatric Renal Transplant Cooperative Study. Pediatr Nephrol. 1999; 13(5):373-8. DOI: 10.1007/s004670050626. View

17.

Weinstein J, Lurie J, Tosteson T, Zhao W, Blood E, Tosteson A . Surgical compared with nonoperative treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. four-year results in the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) randomized and observational cohorts. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009; 91(6):1295-304. PMC: 2686131. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.H.00913. View

18.

Katz J, Lipson S, Chang L, LEVINE S, Fossel A, Liang M . Seven- to 10-year outcome of decompressive surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996; 21(1):92-8. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199601010-00022. View

19.

Rompe J, Eysel P, Zollner J, Nafe B, Heine J . Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Long-term results after undercutting decompression compared with decompressive laminectomy alone or with instrumented fusion. Neurosurg Rev. 1999; 22(2-3):102-6. DOI: 10.1007/s101430050040. View

20.

Amundsen T, Weber H, Nordal H, Magnaes B, Abdelnoor M, Lilleas F . Lumbar spinal stenosis: conservative or surgical management?: A prospective 10-year study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000; 25(11):1424-35; discussion 1435-6. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200006010-00016. View