Foregoing Life-sustaining Treatment in an Israeli ICU

Overview

Journal Intensive Care Med

Specialty Critical Care

Date 1998 Apr 16

PMID 9539075

Citations 23

Authors

L A Eidelman

D J Jakobson

R Pizov

D Geber

L LEIBOVITZ

C L Sprung

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether physicians in Israel withhold and/or withdraw life-sustaining treatments.

Design: A prospective, descriptive study of consecutively admitted patients. Patients were prospectively evaluated for diagnoses, types and reasons for foregoing life-sustaining treatment, mortality and times from foregoing therapy until mortality.

Setting: A general intensive care unit of a university hospital in Israel.

Results: Foregoing life-sustaining treatment occurred in 52 (13.5%) of 385 patients admitted and 5 (1%) had cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Withholding therapy occurred in 48 patients. Four patients with brain death had all treatments withdrawn. No patient had antibiotics, nutrition or fluids withheld or withdrawn. Time from foregoing therapy until death was 2.9 +/- 0.6 days. Thirty-one of 48 (65%) patients who had therapy withheld died within 48 h.

Conclusions: Withholding life-prolonging treatments is common in an Israeli intensive care unit whereas withdrawing therapy is limited to brain dead patients. Terminal patients die soon after withholding, even if the therapy is not withdrawn. Withholding treatments should be an option for patients and professionals who object to withdrawing therapies.

Citing Articles

Differences in directives to limit treatment and discontinue mechanical ventilation between elderly and very elderly patients: a substudy of a multinational observational study.

Burns K, Cook D, Xu K, Dodek P, Villar J, Jones A Intensive Care Med. 2023; 49(10):1181-1190.

PMID: 37736783 DOI: 10.1007/s00134-023-07188-4.

Withholding and withdrawal of life-sustaining treatments in intensive care units in Lebanon: a cross-sectional survey of intensivists and interviews of professional societies, legal and religious leaders.

Jawiche R, Hallit S, Tarabey L, Abou-Mrad F BMC Med Ethics. 2020; 21(1):80.

PMID: 32859185 PMC: 7456082. DOI: 10.1186/s12910-020-00525-y.

Protocol for a randomised trial of an interprofessional team-delivered intervention to support surrogate decision-makers in ICUs.

Lincoln T, Shields A, Buddadhumaruk P, Chang C, Pike F, Chen H BMJ Open. 2020; 10(3):e033521.

PMID: 32229520 PMC: 7170558. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033521.

Limitation of life support techniques at admission to the intensive care unit: a multicenter prospective cohort study.

Rubio O, Arnau A, Cano S, Subira C, Balerdi B, Perea M J Intensive Care. 2018; 6:24.

PMID: 29686878 PMC: 5899386. DOI: 10.1186/s40560-018-0283-y.

Mismatch between physicians and family members views on communications about patients with chronic incurable diseases receiving care in critical and intensive care settings in Georgia: a quantitative observational survey.

Chikhladze N, Janberidze E, Velijanashvili M, Chkhartishvili N, Jintcharadze M, Verne J BMC Palliat Care. 2016; 15:63.

PMID: 27449224 PMC: 4957836. DOI: 10.1186/s12904-016-0135-2.

References

Wood G, Martin E . Withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining therapy in a Canadian intensive care unit. Can J Anaesth. 1995; 42(3):186-91. DOI: 10.1007/BF03010673. View

. In the Matter of Karen Quinlan. 31 Mar 1976. Atl Report. 1976; 355:647-72. View

Luce J . The changing physician-patient relationship in critical care medicine under health care reform. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1994; 150(1):266-70. DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm.150.1.8025762. View

Olick R . Brain death, religious freedom, and public policy: New Jersey's landmark legislative initiative. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1991; 1(4):275-92. DOI: 10.1353/ken.0.0068. View

Smedira N, EVANS B, Grais L, COHEN N, Lo B, Cooke M . Withholding and withdrawal of life support from the critically ill. N Engl J Med. 1990; 322(5):309-15. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199002013220506. View

Asch D, Lanken P . Decisions to limit or continue life-sustaining treatment by critical care physicians in the United States: conflicts between physicians' practices and patients' wishes. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995; 151(2 Pt 1):288-92. DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm.151.2.7842181. View

Christakis N, Asch D . Physician characteristics associated with decisions to withdraw life support. Am J Public Health. 1995; 85(3):367-72. PMC: 1614871. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.85.3.367. View

. Consensus report on the ethics of foregoing life-sustaining treatments in the critically ill. Task Force on Ethics of the Society of Critical Care Medicine. Crit Care Med. 1990; 18(12):1435-9. DOI: 10.1097/00003246-199012000-00026. View

Koch K, Rodeffer H, Wears R . Changing patterns of terminal care management in an intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 1994; 22(2):233-43. DOI: 10.1097/00003246-199402000-00013. View

10.

Sprung C . Changing attitudes and practices in foregoing life-sustaining treatments. JAMA. 1990; 263(16):2211-5. View

11.

Vincent J, Bihari D, Suter P, Bruining H, White J, Wolff M . The prevalence of nosocomial infection in intensive care units in Europe. Results of the European Prevalence of Infection in Intensive Care (EPIC) Study. EPIC International Advisory Committee. JAMA. 1995; 274(8):639-44. View

12.

Cook D, Guyatt G, Jaeschke R, Reeve J, Spanier A, King D . Determinants in Canadian health care workers of the decision to withdraw life support from the critically ill. Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. JAMA. 1995; 273(9):703-8. View

13.

Sprung C, Eidelman L . Worldwide similarities and differences in the foregoing of life-sustaining treatments. Intensive Care Med. 1996; 22(10):1003-5. DOI: 10.1007/BF01699218. View

14.

Luce J . Physicians do not have a responsibility to provide futile or unreasonable care if a patient or family insists. Crit Care Med. 1995; 23(4):760-6. DOI: 10.1097/00003246-199504000-00027. View

15.

Prendergast T, Luce J . Increasing incidence of withholding and withdrawal of life support from the critically ill. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997; 155(1):15-20. DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm.155.1.9001282. View

16.

. Attitudes of critical care medicine professionals concerning forgoing life-sustaining treatments. The Society of Critical Care Medicine Ethics Committee. Crit Care Med. 1992; 20(3):320-6. DOI: 10.1097/00003246-199203000-00005. View

17.

Sprung C, Eidelman L, Pizov R, Fisher Jr C, Ziegler E, Sadoff J . Influence of alterations in foregoing life-sustaining treatment practices on a clinical sepsis trial. The HA-1A Sepsis Study Group. Crit Care Med. 1997; 25(3):383-7. DOI: 10.1097/00003246-199703000-00002. View

18.

Curtis J, Park D, Krone M, Pearlman R . Use of the medical futility rationale in do-not-attempt-resuscitation orders. JAMA. 1995; 273(2):124-8. View

19.

Poses R, Bekes C, Copare F, Scott W . The answer to "What are my chances, doctor?" depends on whom is asked: prognostic disagreement and inaccuracy for critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 1989; 17(8):827-33. DOI: 10.1097/00003246-198908000-00021. View

20.

Turner J, Michell W, Morgan C, Benatar S . Limitation of life support: frequency and practice in a London and a Cape Town intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med. 1996; 22(10):1020-5. DOI: 10.1007/BF01699222. View