» Articles » PMID: 9118650

Influence of Alterations in Foregoing Life-sustaining Treatment Practices on a Clinical Sepsis Trial. The HA-1A Sepsis Study Group

Overview
Journal Crit Care Med
Date 1997 Mar 1
PMID 9118650
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the timing of foregoing life-sustaining treatments in patients enrolled in a sepsis trial and to determine their influence on patient outcome and trial results.

Design: Subset of patients in a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

Setting: Twenty-three academic medical centers.

Patients: Enrolled patients who had life-sustaining therapies withheld or withdrawn.

Measurements And Main Results: The number of patients, types of disorders and interventions, reasons, and timing of withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatments and their effect on mortality and trial results were assessed. Foregoing of life-sustaining therapies took place in 117 (22%) of 543 patients and occurred within 72 hrs of study drug administration in 38 (32%) patients. Withholding treatment (60%) was more common than withdrawing treatment (40%), but withdrawing treatment was more frequent (51%) than withholding treatment (20%) in the first 72 hrs of the trial (p < .01). Sixty-one (52%) patients had severe underlying disorders with a poor prognosis. The hospital mortality rate was 94% (of the 117 patients). The mean time (SEM) from withholding or withdrawing of treatment until death was 2.83 +/- 0.57 and 0.32 +/- 0.13 days, respectively (p < .001). Patients who had therapies foregone in the first 24, 48, and 72 hrs after receiving the study drug had higher mortality rates in the first 72 hrs (p < .01).

Conclusions: A substantial number of patients enrolled in a sepsis trial had severe underlying diseases and had foregoing of therapies early in the course of the trial, which led to a higher early mortality rate. Enrollment of patients in clinical trials with severe underlying disorders with a high likelihood of having therapies foregone may bias the potential for showing the efficacy of new therapeutic modalities.

Citing Articles

Treatment-limiting decisions in patients with severe traumatic brain injury in the Netherlands.

van Erp I, van Essen T, Kompanje E, van der Jagt M, Moojen W, Peul W Brain Spine. 2024; 4:102746.

PMID: 38510637 PMC: 10951765. DOI: 10.1016/j.bas.2024.102746.


The difficulties of clinical trials evaluating therapeutic agents in patients with severe sepsis.

Hall T, Bilku D, Al-Leswas D, Horst C, Dennison A Ir J Med Sci. 2011; 181(1):1-6.

PMID: 22065211 DOI: 10.1007/s11845-011-0778-1.


Back to the future: antibody-based strategies for the treatment of infectious diseases.

Oral H, Ozakin C, Akdis C Mol Biotechnol. 2002; 21(3):225-39.

PMID: 12102547 DOI: 10.1385/MB:21:3:225.


Foregoing life-sustaining treatment in an Israeli ICU.

Eidelman L, Jakobson D, Pizov R, Geber D, LEIBOVITZ L, Sprung C Intensive Care Med. 1998; 24(2):162-6.

PMID: 9539075 DOI: 10.1007/s001340050539.