» Articles » PMID: 9527305

Velopharyngeal Function in Nonsyndromic Cleft Palate: Relevance of Surgical Technique, Age at Repair, and Cleft Type

Overview
Date 1998 Apr 4
PMID 9527305
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The goal of this study was to determine the relative importance of surgical technique, age at repair, and cleft type for velopharyngeal function.

Design: This was a retrospective study of patients operated on by two surgeons using different techniques (von Langenbeck and Veau-Wardill-Kilner [VY]) at Children's Hospital, Boston, MA.

Patients: We included 228 patients who were at least 4 years of age at the time of review. Patients with identifiable syndromes, nonsyndromic Robin sequence, central nervous system disorders, communicatively significant hearing loss, and inadequate speech data were excluded.

Main Outcome Measure: Need for a pharyngeal flap was the measure of outcome.

Results: Pharyngeal flap was necessary in 14% of von Langenbeck and 15% of VY repaired patients. There was a significant linear association (p = .025) between age at repair and velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI). Patients with an attached vomer, soft cleft palate (SCP), and unilateral cleft lip/palate (UCLP) had a 10% flap rate, whereas those with an unattached vomer, hard/soft cleft palate (HSCP), and bilateral cleft lip/palate (BCLP) had a 23% flap rate (p = .03). Age at repair was critical for the unattached-vomer group (p = .03) but was not statistically significant for the attached-vomer group (p = .52).

Conclusions: Surgical technique was not a significant variable either in aggregate or for the Veau types. Patients in the earliest repair group (8-10 months) were the least likely to require a pharyngeal flap. Early repair was more critical for HSCP and BCLP patients. There was no correlation between velopharyngeal insufficiency and Veau hierarchy. The attached vomer/levator muscle complex may be a more important predictor of surgical success than the anatomic extent of cleft.

Citing Articles

Incidence of Velopharyngeal Insufficiency after Primary Cleft Palate Repair: A 27-Year Assessment of One Surgeon's Experience.

Jung C, Seo H, Choi Y, Bae Y Arch Plast Surg. 2024; 51(3):284-289.

PMID: 38737842 PMC: 11081726. DOI: 10.1055/a-2263-7857.


Canonical Wnt signaling regulates soft palate development by mediating ciliary homeostasis.

Janeckova E, Feng J, Guo T, Han X, Ghobadi A, Araujo-Villalba A Development. 2023; 150(5).

PMID: 36825984 PMC: 10108707. DOI: 10.1242/dev.201189.


Long-term Follow-up of Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate: Incidence of Speech-Correcting Surgeries and Fistula Formation.

Gustafsson C, Heliovaara A, Rautio J, Leikola J Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2022; 60(10):1241-1249.

PMID: 35726173 PMC: 10515470. DOI: 10.1177/10556656221102816.


Normative nasalance scores in Chilean adults.

Inostroza-Allende F, Palomares-Aguilera M, Jara M, Gaponov C, Giugliano Villarroel C, Pegoraro-Krook M Codas. 2022; 34(6):e20210152.

PMID: 35352792 PMC: 9886296. DOI: 10.1590/2317-1782/20212021152.


Need for velopharyngeal surgery after primary palatoplasty in cleft patients. A retrospective cohort study and review of literature.

Tache A, Maryn Y, Mommaerts M Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021; 69:102707.

PMID: 34429961 PMC: 8371190. DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102707.