» Articles » PMID: 9420834

Attenuation Compensation for Cardiac Single-photon Emission Computed Tomographic Imaging: Part 1. Impact of Attenuation and Methods of Estimating Attenuation Maps

Overview
Journal J Nucl Cardiol
Date 1995 Nov 1
PMID 9420834
Citations 44
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Attenuation is believed to be one of the major causes of false-positive cardiac single-photon emission computed tomographic (SPECT) perfusion images. This article reviews the physics of attenuation, the artifacts produced by attenuation, and the need for scatter correction in combination with attenuation correction. The review continues with a comparison of the various configurations for transmission imaging that could be used to estimate patient specific attenuation maps, and an overview of how these are being developed for use on multiheaded SPECT systems, including discussions of truncation, noise, and spatial resolution of the estimated attenuation maps. Ways of estimating patient specific attenuation maps besides transmission imaging are also discussed.

Citing Articles

Attenuation Correction for Dedicated Cardiac SPECT Imaging Without Using Transmission Data.

Tadesse G, Geramifar P, Abbasi M, Tsegaw E, Amin M, Salimi A Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther. 2023; 32(1):42-53.

PMID: 36818953 PMC: 9950684. DOI: 10.4274/mirt.galenos.2022.55476.


Accuracy and Reproducibility of Myocardial Blood Flow Quantification by Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography Imaging in Patients With Known or Suspected Coronary Artery Disease.

Carolina do A H de Souza A, Harms H, Martell L, Bibbo C, Harrington M, Sullivan K Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022; 15(6):e013987.

PMID: 35674051 PMC: 9233115. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.122.013987.


A LIST-MODE OSEM-BASED ATTENUATION AND SCATTER COMPENSATION METHOD FOR SPECT.

Rahman M, Laforest R, Jha A Proc IEEE Int Symp Biomed Imaging. 2020; 2020:646-650.

PMID: 33072242 PMC: 7561042. DOI: 10.1109/isbi45749.2020.9098333.


Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Guidelines: Instrumentation, Acquisition, Processing, and Interpretation.

Dorbala S, Ananthasubramaniam K, Armstrong I, Chareonthaitawee P, DePuey E, Einstein A J Nucl Cardiol. 2018; 25(5):1784-1846.

PMID: 29802599 DOI: 10.1007/s12350-018-1283-y.


SPECT/CT: an update on technological developments and clinical applications.

Ljungberg M, Pretorius P Br J Radiol. 2016; 91(1081):20160402.

PMID: 27845567 PMC: 5966195. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20160402.


References
1.
Manglos S, Jaszczak R, Floyd C, Hahn L, Greer K, Coleman R . A quantitative comparison of attenuation-weighted backprojection with multiplicative and iterative postprocessing attenuation compensation in SPECT. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1988; 7(2):127-34. DOI: 10.1109/42.3939. View

2.
Manglos S, Jaszczak R, Floyd C, Hahn L, Greer K, Coleman R . Nonisotropic attenuation in SPECT: phantom tests of quantitative effects and compensation techniques. J Nucl Med. 1987; 28(10):1584-91. View

3.
Pan T, King M, de Vries D, Ljungberg M . Segmentation of the body and lungs from Compton scatter and photopeak window data in SPECT: a Monte-Carlo investigation. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1996; 15(1):13-24. DOI: 10.1109/42.481437. View

4.
Harris C, Greer K, Jaszczak R, Floyd Jr C, Fearnow E, Coleman R . Tc-99m attenuation coefficients in water-filled phantoms determined with gamma cameras. Med Phys. 1984; 11(5):681-5. DOI: 10.1118/1.595623. View

5.
Jaszczak R, Chang L, Stein N, Moore F . Whole-body single-photon emission computed tomography using dual, large-field-of-view scintillation cameras. Phys Med Biol. 1979; 24(6):1123-43. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/24/6/003. View