» Articles » PMID: 35674051

Accuracy and Reproducibility of Myocardial Blood Flow Quantification by Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography Imaging in Patients With Known or Suspected Coronary Artery Disease

Abstract

Background: Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) has limited ability to identify multivessel and microvascular coronary artery disease. Gamma cameras with cadmium zinc telluride detectors allow the quantification of absolute myocardial blood flow (MBF) and myocardial flow reserve (MFR). However, evidence of its accuracy is limited, and of its reproducibility is lacking. We aimed to validate Tc-sestamibi SPECT MBF and MFR using standard and spline-fitted reconstruction algorithms compared with N-ammonia positron emission tomography in a cohort of patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease and to evaluate the reproducibility of this technique.

Methods: Accuracy was assessed in 34 participants who underwent dynamic Tc-sestamibi SPECT and N-ammonia positron emission tomography and reproducibility in 14 participants who underwent 2 Tc-sestamibi SPECT studies, all within 2 weeks. A rest/pharmacological stress single-day SPECT protocol was performed. SPECT images were reconstructed using a standard ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM) algorithm with (N=21) and without (N=30) application of spline fitting. SPECT MBF was quantified using a net retention kinetic model' and MFR was derived as the stress/rest MBF ratio.

Results: SPECT global MBF with splines showed good correlation with N-ammonia positron emission tomography (r=0.81, <0.001) and MFR estimates (r=0.74, <0.001). Correlations were substantially weaker for standard reconstruction without splines (r=0.61, <0.001 and r=0.34, =0.07, for MBF and MFR, respectively). Reproducibility of global MBF estimates with splines in paired SPECT scans was good (r=0.77, <0.001), while ordered subset expectation maximization without splines led to decreased MBF (r=0.68, <0.001) and MFR correlations (r=0.33, =0.3). There were no significant differences in MBF or MFR between the 2 reproducibility scans independently of the reconstruction algorithm (>0.05 for all).

Conclusions: MBF and MFR quantification using Tc-sestamibi cadmium zinc telluride SPECT with spatiotemporal spline fitting improved the correlation with N-ammonia positron emission tomography flow estimates and test/retest reproducibility. The use of splines may represent an important step toward the standardization of SPECT flow estimation.

Citing Articles

Advances in Imaging Techniques for Assessing Myocardial Microcirculation in People with Diabetes : An Overview of Current Techniques, Emerging Techniques, and Clinical Applications.

Hansen T, Ripa R Diabetes Ther. 2025; .

PMID: 40048055 DOI: 10.1007/s13300-025-01710-1.


Comparison of global and regional myocardial blood flow quantification using dynamic solid-state detector SPECT and Tc-99 m-sestamibi or Tc-99 m-tetrofosmin in a routine clinical setting.

Wieting W, Bengel F, Diekmann J Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2025; 41(3):537-548.

PMID: 39885112 PMC: 11880047. DOI: 10.1007/s10554-025-03339-4.


Improved detection of coronary artery disease by CZT regional coronary blood flow evaluation.

Lima R, Bezerra A, Andrade M, Domenico C, De Lorenzo A Front Nucl Med. 2024; 2:1072729.

PMID: 39354966 PMC: 11440858. DOI: 10.3389/fnume.2022.1072729.


Modeling cardiac microcirculation for the simulation of coronary flow and 3D myocardial perfusion.

Montino Pelagi G, Regazzoni F, Huyghe J, Baggiano A, Ali M, Bertoluzza S Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2024; 23(6):1863-1888.

PMID: 38995488 PMC: 11554812. DOI: 10.1007/s10237-024-01873-z.


The diagnostic role of resting myocardial blood flow in STEMI patients after revascularization.

Yan M, Shang H, Guo X, Hao L, Hou S, Zheng H Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 11:1364772.

PMID: 38576422 PMC: 10993732. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1364772.


References
1.
Murthy V, Bateman T, Beanlands R, Berman D, Borges-Neto S, Chareonthaitawee P . Clinical Quantification of Myocardial Blood Flow Using PET: Joint Position Paper of the SNMMI Cardiovascular Council and the ASNC. J Nucl Med. 2017; 59(2):273-293. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.117.201368. View

2.
Wells R, Marvin B, Poirier M, Renaud J, deKemp R, Ruddy T . Optimization of SPECT Measurement of Myocardial Blood Flow with Corrections for Attenuation, Motion, and Blood Binding Compared with PET. J Nucl Med. 2017; 58(12):2013-2019. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.117.191049. View

3.
Giubbini R, Bertoli M, Durmo R, Bonacina M, Peli A, Faggiano I . Comparison between NNH-PET and Tc-Tetrofosmin-CZT SPECT in the evaluation of absolute myocardial blood flow and flow reserve. J Nucl Cardiol. 2019; 28(5):1906-1918. DOI: 10.1007/s12350-019-01939-x. View

4.
Nagamachi S, Czernin J, Kim A, Sun K, Bottcher M, Phelps M . Reproducibility of measurements of regional resting and hyperemic myocardial blood flow assessed with PET. J Nucl Med. 1996; 37(10):1626-31. View

5.
Kitkungvan D, Johnson N, Roby A, Patel M, Kirkeeide R, Gould K . Routine Clinical Quantitative Rest Stress Myocardial Perfusion for Managing Coronary Artery Disease: Clinical Relevance of Test-Retest Variability. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016; 10(5):565-577. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.09.019. View