» Articles » PMID: 9250846

A Comparison of Low-molecular-weight Heparin with Unfractionated Heparin for Unstable Coronary Artery Disease. Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Enoxaparin in Non-Q-Wave Coronary Events Study Group

Overview
Journal N Engl J Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 1997 Aug 14
PMID 9250846
Citations 205
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Antithrombotic therapy with heparin plus aspirin reduces the rate of ischemic events in patients with unstable coronary artery disease. Low-molecular-weight heparin has a more predictable anticoagulant effect than standard unfractionated heparin, is easier to administer, and does not require monitoring.

Methods: In a double-blind, placebo-controlled study, we randomly assigned 3171 patients with angina at rest or non-Q-wave myocardial infarction to receive either 1 mg of enoxaparin (low-molecular-weight heparin) per kilogram of body weight, administered subcutaneously twice daily, or continuous intravenous unfractionated heparin. Therapy was continued for a minimum of 48 hours to a maximum of 8 days, and we collected data on important coronary end points over a period of 30 days.

Results: At 14 days the risk of death, myocardial infarction, or recurrent angina was significantly lower in the patients assigned to enoxaparin than in those assigned to unfractionated heparin (16.6 percent vs. 19.8 percent, P=0.019). At 30 days, the risk of this composite end point remained significantly lower in the enoxaparin group (19.8 percent vs. 23.3 percent, P=0.016). The need for revascularization procedures at 30 days was also significantly less frequent in the patients assigned to enoxaparin (27.1 percent vs. 32.2 percent, P=0.001). The 30-day incidence of major bleeding complications was 6.5 percent in the enoxaparin group and 7.0 percent in the unfractionated-heparin group, but the incidence of bleeding overall was significantly higher in the enoxaparin group (18.4 percent vs. 14.2 percent, P=0.001), primarily because of ecchymoses at injection sites.

Conclusions: Antithrombotic therapy with enoxaparin plus aspirin was more effective than unfractionated heparin plus aspirin in reducing the incidence of ischemic events in patients with unstable angina or non-Q-wave myocardial infarction in the early phase. This benefit of enoxaparin was achieved with an increase in minor but not in major bleeding.

Citing Articles

Can Distal Radial Access Replace Conventional Radial Access for Coronary Catheterization? A Study Comparing Puncture Time, Attempts, Patient and Operator Comfort.

Lalani K, Devasia T, Paramasivam G Anatol J Cardiol. 2024; .

PMID: 39044621 PMC: 11426398. DOI: 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2024.4363.


Therapeutic inefficacy of protocol driven intravenous unfractionated heparin infusion in the current era.

Torppey K, Cohen M, Kaur M, Wasef N, Wats A, Sohal S Am Heart J Plus. 2024; 34:100322.

PMID: 38510949 PMC: 10946016. DOI: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2023.100322.


Usefulness of the Quick-Sepsis Organ Failure Assessment Score in Cardiovascular Intensive Care Unit to Predict Prognosis in Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Bouchlarhem A, Bazid Z, Ismaili N, Noha E Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2023; 29:10760296231218705.

PMID: 38083859 PMC: 10718056. DOI: 10.1177/10760296231218705.


Factors associated with bleeding events from enoxaparin used for patients with acute coronary syndrome.

Weerasaksanti A, Siwamogsatham S, Kunlamas Y, Bunditanukul K BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2023; 23(1):243.

PMID: 37149613 PMC: 10164346. DOI: 10.1186/s12872-023-03278-9.


Effect of Rivaroxaban vs Enoxaparin on Major Cardiac Adverse Events and Bleeding Risk in the Acute Phase of Acute Coronary Syndrome: The H-REPLACE Randomized Equivalence and Noninferiority Trial.

Zhou S, Xiao Y, Zhou C, Zheng Z, Jiang W, Shen Q JAMA Netw Open. 2023; 6(2):e2255709.

PMID: 36763358 PMC: 9918885. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.55709.