» Articles » PMID: 29910048

Discharge Timing and Outcomes After Uncomplicated Non-ST-segment Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction

Abstract

Background: Length of stay after non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) continues to decrease, but information to guide duration of hospitalization is limited.

Methods: We used landmark analyses, in which the landmark defined potential days of discharge, to estimate complication rates on the first day the patient would have been out of the hospital, and estimated associations between timing of discharge and 30-day and 1-year event-free survival after discharge among NSTEMI patients.

Results: Among 20,410 NSTEMI patients, median length of stay was 7 (4, 12) days; 3,209 (15.7%) experienced a cardiac complication on days 0 to 2 and 1,322 (6.5%) were discharged without complications during hospital days 0 to 2. At the start of day 3, 15,879 patients (77.8%) were still hospitalized without complications. Of these, 1,689 (10.6%) were discharged event-free on day 3. Adjusted event-free survival rates of death or myocardial infarction from day 4 to 30 days after among the 1,689 patients was 99.1% compared with 93.1% for the 14,190 who remained hospitalized at the end of day 3. For 1-year mortality, these rates were 98.1% and 96.4%, respectively. Among 13,334 patients hospitalized without complications at the start of day 4, 1,706 were discharged event-free that day. Adjusted survival rates among these patients, compared with those still hospitalized at the end of day 4, were 98.0% versus 93.7% for 30-day death or myocardial infarction and 97.8% versus 96.1% for 1-year mortality.

Conclusions: Patients with NSTEMI who had no serious complications during the first 2 hospital days were at low risk of subsequent short- and intermediate-term death or ischemic events.

Citing Articles

Latin-American guidelines of recommendations at discharge from an acute coronary syndrome.

Ponte-Negretti C, Zaidel E, Lopez-Santi R, Munera-Echeverri A, Bryce A, Negron S Arch Cardiol Mex. 2024; 94(Supl 2):1-52.

PMID: 38848096 PMC: 11798419. DOI: 10.24875/ACM.M24000096.


Be Prepared.

Ardati A, Mena Lora A Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020; 13(4):e006661.

PMID: 32182130 PMC: 7147271. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.120.006661.

References
1.
Newby L, Eisenstein E, Califf R, Thompson T, Nelson C, Peterson E . Cost effectiveness of early discharge after uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2000; 342(11):749-55. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM200003163421101. View

2.
Rogers W, Canto J, LAMBREW C, Tiefenbrunn A, Kinkaid B, Shoultz D . Temporal trends in the treatment of over 1.5 million patients with myocardial infarction in the US from 1990 through 1999: the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 1, 2 and 3. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000; 36(7):2056-63. DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(00)00996-7. View

3.
Bogaty P, Dumont S, OHara G, Boyer L, Auclair L, Jobin J . Randomized trial of a noninvasive strategy to reduce hospital stay for patients with low-risk myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001; 37(5):1289-96. DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(01)01131-7. View

4.
. Randomized, placebo-controlled trial of titrated intravenous lamifiban for acute coronary syndromes. Circulation. 2002; 105(3):316-21. DOI: 10.1161/hc0302.102573. View

5.
Newby L, Hasselblad V, Armstrong P, Van de Werf F, Mark D, White H . Time-based risk assessment after myocardial infarction. Implications for timing of discharge and applications to medical decision-making. Eur Heart J. 2003; 24(2):182-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0195-668x(02)00301-9. View