» Articles » PMID: 9210204

In Vitro/in Vivo Comparison of Drug Release and Polymer Erosion from Biodegradable P(FAD-SA) Polyanhydrides--a Noninvasive Approach by the Combined Use of Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Spectroscopy and Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Overview
Journal Pharm Res
Specialties Pharmacology
Pharmacy
Date 1997 Jun 1
PMID 9210204
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare drug release and polymer erosion from biodegradable P(FAD-SA) polyanhydrides in vitro and in vivo in real time and with minimal disturbance of the investigated system.

Methods: P(FAD-SA) 20:80 and P(FAD-SA) 50:50 polymer tablets were loaded with the spin probe 3-carboxy-2,2,5,5-tetramethyl-pyrrollidine-1-oxyl (PCA) and implanted subcutaneously in the neck of rats or placed in 0.1 M phosphate buffer. 1.1 GHz EPR spectroscopy experiments and 7T MRI studies (T1 and T2 weighted) were performed.

Results: A front of water penetration was visible by MRI in vitro in the case of P(FAD-SA) 20:80, but not for P(FAD-SA) 50:50. For both polymers, the thickness of the tablets decreased with time and a insoluble, easy deformable residue remained. Important processes such as edema, deformation of the implant, encapsulation and bioresorption were observable by MRI in vivo. P(FAD-SA) 50:50 was almost entirely absorbed by day 44, whereas an encapsulated residue was found for P(FAD-SA) 20:80 after 65 days. The EPR studies gave direct evidence of a water penetration induced changes of the microenvironment inside the tablet. EPR signals were still detectable in P(FAD-SA) 20:80 implants after 65 days, while the nitroxide was released in vitro within 16 days.

Conclusions: Important parameters and processes such as edema, deformation of the tablet, microviscosity inside the tablet and encapsulation can be monitored in real time by the combined use of the noninvasive techniques MRI and EPR leading to better understanding of the differences between the in vitro and in vivo situation.

Citing Articles

New Insight into the Mechanism of Drug Release from Poly(d,l-lactide) Film by Electron Paramagnetic Resonance.

Chumakova N, Golubeva E, Kuzin S, Ivanova T, Grigoriev I, Kostjuk S Polymers (Basel). 2020; 12(12).

PMID: 33353203 PMC: 7767321. DOI: 10.3390/polym12123046.


Comparison of sequential drug release in vitro and in vivo.

Sundararaj S, Al-Sabbagh M, Rabek C, Dziubla T, Thomas M, Puleo D J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2015; 104(7):1302-10.

PMID: 26111338 PMC: 4691229. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.33472.


Emerging insights into barriers to effective brain tumor therapeutics.

Woodworth G, Dunn G, Nance E, Hanes J, Brem H Front Oncol. 2014; 4:126.

PMID: 25101239 PMC: 4104487. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2014.00126.


Monitoring microviscosity and microacidity of the albumin microenvironment inside degrading microparticles from poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLG) or ABA-triblock polymers containing hydrophobic poly(lactide-co-glycolide) A blocks and hydrophilic....

Mader K, Bittner B, Li Y, Wohlauf W, Kissel T Pharm Res. 1998; 15(5):787-93.

PMID: 9619791 DOI: 10.1023/a:1011939607573.

References
1.
Weissleder R, Poss K, Wilkinson R, Zhou C, Bogdanov Jr A . Quantitation of slow drug release from an implantable and degradable gentamicin conjugate by in vivo magnetic resonance imaging. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995; 39(4):839-45. PMC: 162639. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.39.4.839. View

2.
Wu M, Tamada J, Brem H, Langer R . In vivo versus in vitro degradation of controlled release polymers for intracranial surgical therapy. J Biomed Mater Res. 1994; 28(3):387-95. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.820280314. View

3.
Brem H, Tamargo R, Olivi A, Pinn M, Weingart J, Wharam M . Biodegradable polymers for controlled delivery of chemotherapy with and without radiation therapy in the monkey brain. J Neurosurg. 1994; 80(2):283-90. DOI: 10.3171/jns.1994.80.2.0283. View

4.
Mader K, Bacic G, Domb A, Elmalak O, Langer R, Swartz H . Noninvasive in vivo monitoring of drug release and polymer erosion from biodegradable polymers by EPR spectroscopy and NMR imaging. J Pharm Sci. 1997; 86(1):126-34. DOI: 10.1021/js9505105. View

5.
Reisfeld B, Blackband S, Calhoun V, Grossman S, Eller S, Leong K . The use of magnetic resonance imaging to track controlled drug release and transport in the brain. Magn Reson Imaging. 1993; 11(2):247-52. DOI: 10.1016/0730-725x(93)90029-d. View